Moderators of Tulsa

Moderators of Tulsa Freecycle.org Cherity S. I WAS BANNED FROM TULSA FREECYCLE BEFORE I EVER GOT THE CHANCE TO USE THE SERVICE! Internet

9th of Apr, 2011 by User885486

I DO USE ALL CAPS, AS I CAN SEE IT EASIER WITH MY EYESIGHT TROUBLE. TRULY, I AM NOT "YELLING" AT ANYONE. THIS ISSUE IS PRECISELY THE REASON WHY SHE BANNED ME FROM THAT WEBSITE WHEN I ATTEMPTED TO POST MY FIRST 3ADS. IF A PERSON HAS A VISUAL HANDICAP THAT IS LESS INTENSE BY USING ALL CAPS, WHICH MAKES SEEING EASIER, THEN THAT IS A "REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION." IT SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS "YELLING" IF IT IS ANNOUNCED THAT IT IS A MEANS TO LESSEN THE DIFFICULTY ASSOCIATED WITH A VISUAL IMPAIRMENT BY USING ALL CAPS TO TYPE WITH, WHICH IS WHAT I ORIGINALLY DID DO. IF AN EXCLAMATION POINT IS USED AT THE END OF A SENTENCE INSTEAD OF A PERIOD, THEN THAT CHANGES THE SENTENCE FROM DECLARATORY TO EXCLAMATORY, AND STILL SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS "YELLING," WHICH IS WHAT THAT MODERATOR TERMED IT IN HER TERSE REACTION OF HER SUBSCRIPTION TERMINATION LETTER TO ME. NOT ONLY THAT, BUT SHE BANNED ME FROM EVER BEING ALLOWED TO RESPOND TO HER WITH ANY KIND OF COMMENTS AT ALL IN MY OWN DEFENSE, OR TRY TO CLARIFY ANYTHING! IN FACT, SHE THREATENED TO HAVE ME ARRESTED FOR LIBELLING HER NAME, AMONG OTHER THINGS SHE SAID. SHE MISREAD WHAT I HAD WRITTEN, AND THEN REFUSED TO ALLOW ME TO CLARIFY WHAT WAS SAID IN REALITY. THE SENTENCE SHE REALLY HONED IN ON WAS NOT A PERSONAL ATTACK ON HER; I MERELY STATED HOW I PERSONALLY FELT ABOUT WHAT WAS HAPPENING TO ME THROUGH THIS WHOLE ORDEAL. IF SHE IS NOT GOING TO BE MATURE ENOUGH TO ALLOW ONE TO RESPOND IN ONE'S OWN DEFENSE, AND INSTEAD JUST BANS A PERSON, THEN THIS MODERATOR SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THIS LEADERSHIP POSITION BECAUSE SHE IS NOT WISE OR MATURE ENOUGH TO HANDLE THE POSITION. THAT'S MY FEELING ON THE SUBJECT!

Track this Report 0 Comment | Post a Comment