| Florida.arrests.org |
| extortion racket |
| 23rd of Jun, 2011 by Home Boy |
CRUNCHLINE LLC, Robert Wiggen, Tiffany A Wiggen, James Cody Wiggen, Alice Wiggen
Florida.Arrests.org is leading a Large and Rapidly growing Scam here in Florida
Anyone who claims they can "Remove your mugshot" from Florida.Arrests.Org actually has a direct relationship and direct access to Florida.Arrests.Org
Here are multiple websites affiliated with Florida.Arrests.Org and the Mugshot SCAM. They are making money from mugshots on Florida.Arrests.Org
RemoveSlander.com , RemoveItNow.com , Remove-Mugshot.com , ImageMaxPR.com , [url=http://www.punchgoogle.com]Remove Slander.com Remove Negative Articles, Links, & Blogs From The 1st Page[/url] , [url=http://www.tyronnejacques.com/Remove_Convictions.html]Remove Mug Shots From Google[/url]
Here's the phone number for all of these websites 1(985)633-1413
There are three names behind this phone number which may All perhaps be ficticious. Philip Lee, Ron Collins, and Tyronne Jacques - three names associated with the Florida.Arrests.org Scam
Now here is a list of the Fake News websites created by people affiliated with Florida.Arrests.Org , RemoveSlander.com , RemoveItNow.com ETC -Notice the articles all bolster about these scam sites as if they are real reputable companies when these news websites are only built to promote their fake services of them and their affiliates.
[url=http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/03/prweb5193864.htm]Patricia Stead Partners with RemoveSlander.com to Prevent Student Cyber Bullying[/url]
[url=http://ecommerceprnews.com/index.htm]The Latest Top E-commerce News, Articles, and Info[/url]
[url=http://www.onlineprnews.com/news/87714-1292179546-need-help-removing-a-dui-arrest-from-the-first-page-of-google-new-website-explains-how-to.html]Need Help Removing A DUI Arrest From The First Page Of Google New Website Explains How To[/url]
[url=http://www.wiredprnews.com/2011/06/02/image-max-pr-answers-how-to-remove-lookwhogotbustedcom_2011060219731.html]Image Max PR Answers: How To Remove LookWhoGotBusted.com | Press Release Distribution Service[/url]
[url=http://www.wirednewsengine.com/2011/05/09/httpwwwimagemaxprcomflorida-arrest-mug-shot-searchhtml_2011050912323.html]Florida.Arrest.org: How To Remove Florida Arrest.org Mug Shot From Google[/url]
[url=http://www.onlineprnews.com/news/33011-1272376085-helping-stop-cyber-bullying-image-max-pr-sells-over-2500-eraser-max-entries-in-less-than-a-month.html]Helping Stop Cyber Bullying Image Max PR Sells Over 2,500 Eraser Max Entries in Less Than a Month[/url]
[url=http://article.wn.com/view/2011/05/09/Remove_Florida_Arrestorg_Mug_Shot_Today/]Remove Florida Arrest.org Mug Shot Today - Worldnews.com[/url]
Behind the Grand Scheme of Florida.Arrests.Org is a Company named Crunchline LLC involving Craig R Wiggen / Robert Wiggen, his son James Cody Wiggen, his wife Alice Wiggen, and their daughter Tiffany A Wiggen and his son James Cody Wiggen. Father and Son!
There are a few addresses for this piece of **** of a family listed online -
FL, Flagler Beach, 1353 N Daytona Ave, 32136
FL, Tallahassee, 1834 Jackson Bluff Rd, 32304
The daughter, Tiffany A Wiggen goes to college at UN (University of North FL)
Here's her myspace [url=http://www.myspace.com/tiffanyyyy]Tiffany Wiggen (TWIGGY) on Myspace[/url]
There are many more scumbags involved but the main people who are in control of this problem is the Wiggen Family - The owners of Florida.Arrests.Org which can be located at FL, Flagler Beach, 1353 N Daytona Ave, 32136 and FL, Tallahassee, 1834 Jackson Bluff Rd, 32304
If you get any new information about the Florida.Arrests.Org Scam please Email US @ [email][email protected][/email]
Thanks!
The website Mugshots.com is owned and operated by Moniker Privacy Services LLC, located 20 SW 27th Avenue, Ste 201, Pompano Beach, Florida 33069. Phone number 954-984-8444. Email: [email protected]
The managing agent is: Domain Systems, Inc. and they also do business as SolutionsHome.com, Inc, and HitDomain.com, Inc., and Kanoodle.comMergerSub, Inc.
They charge a fee to anyone wanting to exploit the unfortunate circumstances of someone who has had the misfortune of being arrested.
This company is registered at the following site.
http://www.sunbiz.org/scripts/cordet.exe?action=DETFIL&inq_doc_number=P00000072934&inq_came_from=NAMFWD&cor_web_names_seq_number=0000&names_name_ind=N&names_cor_number=&names_name_seq=&names_name_ind=&names_comp_name=DOMAINSYSTEMS&names_filing_type= |
|
|
|
|
| Facebook doesn't allow harassment. If someone posts something derogatory on a public section of facebook, you report it as harassment, and it gets removed. Unlike you, they actually understand the law lol. |
|
|
|
| Pattie, if someone posts derogatory information about you in a public section of facebook, it's considered harassment. You report it to facebook and facebook deletes it. Unlike you, facebook clearly has an understanding of the law. |
|
|
|
All your arguments so far have failed but you continue to evolve into new ideas which make no sense at all.
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
Not sure what planet you are living on.
>Furthermore, US code clearly states what isn't acceptable in terms of publishing information out of public record:
This guidance is law enforcement agencies, not private corporations. It's part of the Open Records Act. The information published by Florida.Arrests was already published by law enforcement and passed whatever test it was suppose to pass. At that point that information becomes public domain where anyone can republish. |
|
|
|
What you're stating is The "Open Records Act", which applies to law enforcement agencies, not for private corporations. Once the information is released to the public it becomes public domain, and republishing it is protected by the first amendment.
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's just wishful thinking. |
|
|
|
Hugh Hendry – partner, CIO
Telephone +44 (0) 20 7792 6400
Fax +44 (0) 20 7792 6401
Eclectica Asset Management LLP
6 Salem Road
London
W2 4BU |
|
|
|
Does anyone Know a Hugh Hendry – partner, CIO or Eclectica?
I just want to know if anyone has any information on him or the company good or bad?
Eclectica Asset Management LLP
6 Salem Road
London
W2 4BU |
|
|
|
What you have mentioned here, "Open Records Act", is for low enforcement agencies, not private corporations. Once it passed whatever test and released by law enforcement, it is in the public domain.
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's just wishful thinking. |
|
|
|
>You're supposed to place bot scripts around personally identifiable information.
No you're not. There isn't such a law and if there were it would be unconstitutional. That's wishful thinking. If that was the case all those Facebook names you see on Google wouldn't have been there. All MyLife and other people search listings wouldn't have been there.
>Look up us code § 552.
That's The Freedom of Information Act, , it applies to government agencies, not private corporations.
>. Why on earth do you think Encyclopedia Dramatica was taken down?
Not sure where on earth you get your information from. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's wishful thinking.
>This site is clearly in violation, and has put itself in a pretty bad position.
Nothing you have said so far indicated any violation. I understand you and others are upset that now the results show on Google however it isn't the sites fault. The government released this information to the public like Google and other search engines, these sites catalog those results and made them a little easier to find. That's really all they do. They don't change the information, they don't make up facts, and they don't call you to remove anything from their sites. They just republish material which was already published by the government. That's not a scam nor a crime. |
|
|
|
>You're supposed to place bot scripts around personally identifiable information.
No you're not. There isn't such a law and if there were it would be unconstitutional. That's wishful thinking. If that was the case all those Facebook names you see on Google wouldn't have been there. All MyLife and other people search listings wouldn't have been there.
>Look up us code § 552.
That's The Freedom of Information Act, , it applies to government agencies, not private corporations.
>. Why on earth do you think Encyclopedia Dramatica was taken down?
Not sure where on earth you get your information from. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's wishful thinking.
>This site is clearly in violation, and has put itself in a pretty bad position.
Nothing you have said so far indicated any violation. I understand you and others are upset that now the results show on Google however it isn't the sites fault. The government released this information to the public like Google and other search engines, these sites catalog those results and made them a little easier to find. That's really all they do. They don't change the information, they don't make up facts, and they don't call you to remove anything from their sites. They just republish material which was already published by the government. That's not a scam nor a crime. |
|
|
|
>You're supposed to place bot scripts around personally identifiable information.
No you're not. There isn't such a law and if there were it would be unconstitutional. That's wishful thinking. If that was the case all those Facebook names you see on Google wouldn't have been there. All MyLife and other people search listings wouldn't have been there.
>Look up us code § 552.
That's The Freedom of Information Act, , it applies to government agencies, not private corporations.
>. Why on earth do you think Encyclopedia Dramatica was taken down?
Not sure where on earth you get your information from. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's wishful thinking.
>This site is clearly in violation, and has put itself in a pretty bad position.
Nothing you have said so far indicated any violation. I understand you and others are upset that now the results show on Google however it isn't the sites fault. The government released this information to the public like Google and other search engines, these sites catalog those results and made them a little easier to find. That's really all they do. They don't change the information, they don't make up facts, and they don't call you to remove anything from their sites. They just republish material which was already published by the government. That's not a scam nor a crime. |
|
|
|
>You're supposed to place bot scripts around personally identifiable information.
No you're not. If that was the case all those Facebook names you see on Google wouldn't have been there. All MyLife and other people search listings wouldn't have been there.
>Look up us code § 552.
That's The Freedom of Information Act, , it applies to government agencies and has nothing to do with private corporations.
>. Why on earth do you think Encyclopedia Dramatica was taken down?
Not sure where on earth you get your information from. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's wishful thinking.
>This site is clearly in violation, and has put itself in a pretty bad position.
Nothing you have said so far indicates any sort of violation. I understand you and others are upset that the search results are now easier to find on Google. Like Google, these sites catalog those results and make them a little easier to find. That's really all they do. They don't change the information, they don't make up facts, and they don't call you to remove anything from their sites. They just republish material which was already published by the government. That's not a scam nor a crime. |
|
|
|
>You're supposed to place bot scripts around personally identifiable information.
No you're not. If that was the case all those Facebook names you see on Google wouldn't have been there. All MyLife and other people search listings wouldn't have been there.
>Look up us code § 552.
That's The Freedom of Information Act, , it applies to government agencies and has nothing to do with private corporations.
>. Why on earth do you think Encyclopedia Dramatica was taken down?
Not sure where on earth you get your information from. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's wishful thinking.
>This site is clearly in violation, and has put itself in a pretty bad position.
Nothing you have said so far indicates any sort of violation. I understand you and others are upset that the search results are now easier to find on Google. Like Google, these sites catalog those results and make them a little easier to find. That's really all they do. They don't change the information, they don't make up facts, and they don't call you to remove anything from their sites. They just republish material which was already published by the government. That's not a scam nor a crime. |
|
|
|
>You're supposed to place bot scripts around personally identifiable information.
No you're not. If that was the case all those Facebook names you see on Google wouldn't have been there. All MyLife and other people search listings wouldn't have been there.
>Look up us code § 552.
That's The Freedom of Information Act, , it applies to government agencies and has nothing to do with private corporations.
>. Why on earth do you think Encyclopedia Dramatica was taken down?
Not sure where on earth you get your information from. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's wishful thinking.
>This site is clearly in violation, and has put itself in a pretty bad position.
Nothing you have said so far indicates any sort of violation. I understand you and others are upset that the search results are now easier to find on Google. Like Google, these sites catalog those results and make them a little easier to find. That's really all they do. They don't change the information, they don't make up facts, and they don't call you to remove anything from their sites. They just republish material which was already published by the government. That's not a scam nor a crime. |
|
|
|
>You're supposed to place bot scripts around personally identifiable information.
No you're not. If that was the case all those Facebook names you see on Google wouldn't have been there. All MyLife and other people search listings wouldn't have been there.
>Look up us code § 552.
That's The Freedom of Information Act, , it applies to government agencies and has nothing to do with private corporations.
>. Why on earth do you think Encyclopedia Dramatica was taken down?
Not sure where on earth you get your information from. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_Dramatica
>You have to ask the person's permission first... then that person has the right to charge you to be able to publish it.. not the other way around.
That's wishful thinking.
>This site is clearly in violation, and has put itself in a pretty bad position.
Nothing you have said so far indicates any sort of violation. I understand you and others are upset that the search results are now easier to find on Google. Like Google, these sites catalog those results and make them a little easier to find. That's really all they do. They don't change the information, they don't make up facts, and they don't call you to remove anything from their sites. They just republish material which was already published by the government. That's not a scam nor a crime. |
|
|
|
| courtney did they for $14.95 take it off all the other sites and remove the google.com picture? |
|
|
|
| http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/08/mugshots/ |
|
|
|
Courtney -
I know it got removed, but maybe you could post the link and /phone number again?
Thanks - Clark. |
|
|
|
| IS there any new updates on how to remove your picture and information? I have lost a job over it and my case was dropped and never even went to court. |
|
|
|
| We are looking for this Robert guy all the address are rental property we call Orange County Polices and ANDERSON COOPER from CNN we e mail him and asked him for Help!!! |
|
|
|
How can we fight back? Maybe everyone should start linking http://www.scaminformer.com/scam-report/florida-arrests-org-extortion-racket-c37805.html
in the comments section of random mugshots at florida.arrest.org
Even better, create a petition against the posting of mugshots and charging to remove them!
Then we all can ban together and enter the link to the petition on all mugshots posted for everyone to easily access the petition.
Can someone create an online petition to urge the legal community to file a class-action lawsuit against these companies? They are makingmoney off these pictures and it should be illegal to do so. Who is to say they will not pop up again? And who is to say how many people are coming up with their own version of this scam?
I still can not believe a lawyer has not jumped on this $$$$
Whats next, a foreclosure website? |
|
|
« Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Post your Comment
|
|
|
