In February 2003, Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney was involved in suing Fry's Eletronics who filed a motion entitled, “Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Stay to Prohibit Conflicting and Vexatious Litigation Based on Changed Facts or Alternatively, Motion for Reconsideration of November 22, 2002 Order Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Stay.”… Fry's supported its motion with various documents it lodged in this case that were taken from the Apex case.”..”require that we direct the trial court to grant judgment on the pleadings in favor of Fry's” (Lytwyn v. Fry's Electronics, Inc. (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 1455, 1464 [25 Cal.Rptr.3d 791].) *
It is amazing how cases Scott McMillan La Mesa Attorney lost, and Michelle Volk, San Diego Attorney, for example,
Scott McMillan eD061265 37-2011-00052050-CU-PO-NC Tri-City Healthcare
District v. Sterling Scott A. McMillan
The McMillan Law Firm, APC
D060490 37-2011-00052069-CU-PT-NC Tri-City Healthcare District v. Sterling Scott A. McMillan
The McMillan Law Firm, APC
D060431 37-2011-00052050-CU-PO-NC Tri-City Healthcare District et al. v. Sterling Scott A. McMillan
The McMillan Law Firm, APC
D059816 37-2011-00052112-CU-PT-NC Tri-City Healthcare District v. Sterling Scott A. McMillan
The McMillan Law Firm, APC
D059815 37-2011-00052114-CU-PT-NC Tri-City Healthcare District v. Sterling Scott A. McMillan
The McMillan Law Firm, APC
• Williams v. Nordstrom, Inc., SD Sup Ct. 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL, Plaintiff and his counsel, were sanctioned nearly $16,000 for discovery abuse; case on appeal, see Case Number D069051
• Williams v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Nordstrom, Inc., D068765, 37-2014-00007604-CU-CR-CTL (writ denied)
• McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc. 37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL, D067610 (writ denied) [law firm posted its OWN reviews]
• Plikaytis v. Fairmont, L.P. et al. Case Number D066876 (lost appeal)
• McMillan Law Group, Inc. et al. v. The Superior Court of San Diego County/Yelp, Inc.D067610
37-2014-00004953-CU-BT-CTL (case where law firm was sued by Yelp! for posting its OWN REVIEWS – lost writ petition)
• Kelegian v. Anders et al., Case Number D067328 (Transfer/certification denied)
• Williams v. Digius et al. Case No. D064183 (opposed defendant’s appeal and lost)
• Oceans Eleven Casino v. Anders, Case Number S219395 (lost California Supreme Court case)
• Bridgeman v. Allen et al., Case Number D062183 (lost appeal AND McMillan’s client forced to pay costs of respondent)
• Morton v. Spotts, Case Number D058640 (McMillan lost appeal – his client lost at trial and found liable for $15,000)
Real, well-educated attorneys (McMillan graduated from a small unknown school behind a car dealership at the time) I believe have true success rates and publish those cases to demonstrate success – see Horvitz & Levy recent wins, or even the one man firm of The Ehrlich Firm has numerous wins to his credit, or Morris Polich & Purdy who have dozens of wins at the court of appeal and supreme court. The point being, I think those law firms earned the right to claim to be experts, and “leading” law firms since each firms history demonstrates they truly win. Typically, a law firm does not self proclaim it “is” a “leading” law firm, but they are ranked by the legal community, legal publications, and provided awards and other forms of recognition by legal associations, government, etc. |
