| Camila Vallejo Dowling |
| Camila Vallejo Dowling Camila Vallejo, Camila Vallejo Dowling Shame, Fake, Fraudulant, Fraud, Manipulate Internet, Internet |
| 26th of Aug, 2011 by User986895 |
| Translate in English. (CV stands for Camila Vallejo) Camila Vallejo Dowling is not a rebel. That is a created image to market the student protests. Given the inaccurate and outrageously false statements she has issued over the past few months there are a few conclusions to be made. "Rebel" is a wholly incurate depiction about her because she is just about gaining notoriety and attention to serve her ego. Camila Vallejo has been heard talking about being like a "celebrity" and that she will get rich from this because corporations will wants to "sell" her "rebel" image. As the president of the university, Camila Vallejo started out speaking for the student movement but it seems this has taken over her ego as she has grossly misrepresented herself and the movement. She has repeatedly bragged about being famous and this seems to be her motivation. A serious revolutionary does not engage in such self promotion. A true agent of change does not make grandiose and delusional claims about serious political and social issues and themselves. Shame. All she seems to say is: "Look at me, look at me, take my picture, take my picture!! " Camila has spent alot of time getting her picture taken and very little time organizing or saying anything truthful. Her own self promotion speaks for itself. Regarding the Chile student movement: Camila has taken credit for many ideas that were not hers and that is not fair. It is important to speak out because it isnt fair and she is hurting people rather than helping them as her interest is not for the people. This is not the behavior of a true leader. There are pictures of CV everywhere and she has worked tirelessly to promote her image. But that is all it is, image. Behind the scenes it is a different story. CV does not organize the student movement by herself and does not even really do anything except be the talking head while everyone else does all the work. The UK Guardian article and Camila have made a mockery out of the Chilean people and hard working organizers who are simply trying to create real substantial change in Chile's government. Regarding the grossly false UK Guardian article "2 Day Shut Down of a City" - The Facts: Not that there's anything wrong with the facts presented here, it is simply to point out the hypocrisy as CV has gone on long enough issuing false statements. Camila Vallejo is a geography student and grew up with 2 parents in a middle class household and went to private school. In other words, by Chile standards she is a rich woman who has never stuggled for anything except the struggle of seeking attention and tireless self promotion. She has never even had to work a day in her life. The UK Guardian article about "a rebel" shutting down" a city for 2 days may make for a catchy "story" to commodify and sell, however, the Guardian article is 100% false and must issue a retraction. Camila Vallejo did not "shut down a city." That is an outrageous incorrect statement. While it is a good thing to speak out and try to make change the facts are that CV has turned into a fraud who makes outrageous claims about things that are not true and it is time to get back to reality. The statement Camila Vallejo issued about the Chile protests, "It is always the youth who always make the first move [...] now the older generations have joined us in this fight." is catagorically false. This statement illustrates unintelligence, ignorance and ego based on nothing more than her grand delusions. On the contrary, the Revolutionary Chilean Protests have been an on-going series of protests led by large labor unions, professors and teachers over the span of many years. It is the students who have contributed and have joined in. The Chilean protest movement led by The Workers United Center of Chile (CUT) over the span of many years has created substantial change in economic, educational and social policy reform and may lead the way for historical constitutional reforms. August 24-25 2011 was a historical event as it marks the first 2 day labor union strike in Chile's history.The fact is that the 2 day shut down of the city Santiago in Chile was organized by The Unitary Central for Workers (CUT). CUT is a labor union made up of over 80 unions. These unions had been working and organizing since May 2011 to prepare for the historical strike. How grossly ridiculous for the Guardian to claim that one person "shut down" a city when in fact it took the hard work of over 80 Chilean Labor Unions. And it is equally grossly ridiculous for CV to claim the credit for such a serious social and political event. According to CUT, at least 600,000 people participated in the historical two-day labor strike. The 2 day strike led by Chile’s most powerful unions and launched the nationwide strike on August 24th. Chile’s largest labor confederation, the Central Workers Union (CUT), organized and planned for demonstrations, marches and protests with the support of politicians, citizens and more than 80 of Chile’s most important social organizations and unions. With powerful unions like the National Association of Public Employees (ANEF) and unionized miners at the state-owned Codelco copper company vowing to participate, Finance Minister Felipe LarraÃn predicted that the strikes cost the nation upwards of US$200 million. While previous governments have faced one-day national strikes, it was the first 48-hour national strike in Chile's history. Do the fact checking and inform yourself. |
|
|
|
|
The students we do all of the work and organizing and simply cannot stand to hear Ms. Vallejo´s hypocrisy anymore.
Camila Vallejo may appear to care but one can simply research Jaime Garjardo or any other Labor Union member, or Education Minister and you will find that Camila has only said things about education reform that he has already said many times over many years. There is nothing new nor innovative nor "rebellious" from Ms. Vallejo. I don't care about their Communist JJCC (Juventudes Comunistas de Chile) http://www.jjcc.cl/wps/?p=1057 agenda except for the fact that the media has taken the false Guardian article and presented complete lies.
This note written by Chilean students on Facebook is the truth.
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1061339276#!/notes/claudio-felipe-nu%C3%B1ez/para-reflexionar-me-la-mandaron-no-es-mia/2251273517671
That is ¨protest lingo¨and used to garner attention to our cause and I can assure you it was not Ms Vallejo´s idea to be called a rebel. She takes credit for the accomplishments of other hard working students who do not have parents that pay for their education. The Chilean highschool students who were on a hunger strike starving themselves to death for education are rebels. Camila Vallejo attended private school her whole life and has never even had a job. She is 24 years old, that is not young, there are many younger working professionals already in the Labor Union who are professors and teachers and have families. There is nothing wrong with being blessed, Ms. Vallejo's parents pay for her education and pay for her whole livelihood and her boyfriend, fellow Communist and former FECH president Julio Sarmiento, is also middle to upper class. Nothing wrong with this, but luxury does not really create an authentic rebel. It is great she has never had to struggle or even have a job by her adult age - but how does this make her a rebel? Mr. Sarmiento has spent alot of time behind the scenes promoting Camila and contacting media outlets. Camila charges over $3, 900 for a speaking engagement - let me put it this way, thousands of students have spoken out against Camila Vallejo's hypocrisy but they are threatened by JJCC Communist party. Camila Vallejo did not even get voted in to FECH by the majority vote of the student population. All you have to do is read and view the JJCC website and you will discover that they are extremely devoted to their Communist cause. Camila Vallejo and Julio Sarmiento have worked hard to promote and sell Camila's image in order to present a new "Brand" and a new way of marketing JJCC Communist party. You will read on the JJCC that they try to dispel the myths around Communism and that they "do not eat babies." What better way to dispel the myth than to create the notion of a "rebel" but it is all typical common protest propaganda to gain attention to a cause, and in this case, ultimately the cause is for JJCC. Read the JJC website. What do you know about Communism? Did you “buy” what they are “selling?” Have you bought into the image so much that it makes you forget that it is for Communist agenda. Does it present a kinder gentler brand of Communism to you? Has it destroyed your image of the fat old mean baby eating man Communist? Mission accomplished. One can examine the JJCC website and easily discover that the goal of JJCC is too present the Communist "agenda" in a brand new "youthful" light. With JJCC Communists posters depicting 17 year old high school students that states, "mas jovenes que nunca" which means, "Younger than Ever." |
|
|
|
Camila VallejoCopy and paste into your web brower to view the link on Facebook or read it below
Camila Vallejo did not get the majority vote of FECH but only about 700 votes of students out of tens of thousands. Ms. Vallejo is not a rebel. The rebels are the students who starved themselves for education reform. The rebels are the ordinary people, labor unions and students protesting in
the streets. Camila Vallejo spends her time trying to get publicity and trying to get famous.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/claudio-felipe-nu%C3%B1ez/para-reflexionar-me-la-mandaron-no-es-mia/2251273517671
para reflexionar... (me la mandaron no es mia.)
Wednesday, August 31, 2011 at 6:18pm
Estimada Camila:
Parto por decirte que siento pena por ver a una chica tan bonita e
inteligente adherida a ideas tan añejas como el catre de bronce y las
polainas. Si se trata de ser antisistémicos, el anarquismo es harto más
moderno y simpático que el comunismo, que ya forma parte de la arqueología
política.
Al menos el anarquismo tiene algo muy salutífero: no le pone cortapisas a la
libertad. En verdad, abusa de la libertad. aunque no la ahoga.
Ustedes ya ganaron, Camila. El gobierno tiene las puertas más que abiertas y
ahora es el momento de entrar a conversar, de cambiar la descalificación por
el diálogo, las piedras por las propuestas y las consignas por los
argumentos.
El lenguaje de barricada ya devino en ese "infantilismo revolucionario" que
tanto daño le hace al orden establecido, ese que a ratos nos molesta. pero
es el que tenemos y hemos construido entre todos.
Lo podemos cambiar, cierto, pero jamás en torno a la lógica del combo, la
piedra y el escupitajo.
Camila: un viejo adagio dice que hay que predicar con el ejemplo. Antes de
reclamar contra el sistema binominal, de exigir justicia y acusar de falta
de representatividad al gobierno, debes "partir por ordenar la casa".
No sé si estarás enterada de que en la Feuc la situación es muy injusta.
Allí el consejo opera a través de un sistema de sufragios ponderados. Según
el sistema de estos muchachos, un voto de un alumno de la facultad de
Ingeniería (con 3.362 alumnos de pregrado) representa en el consejo un 0, 1
del voto final. En cambio, un alumno de las carreras de Física y Matemáticas
(con 410 alumnos de pregrado) representa un 0, 7% del voto final. Por lo
tanto, el sufragio emitido por el estudiante de Física vale cinco veces más
que el del alumno de Ingeniería.
¿Es esto ejemplo de representatividad?
Tú tampoco lo haces nada de mal. No toda la opinión pública sabe que fuiste
elegida con sólo 771 votos, de un total de 8.994 sufragios.y en un universo
de 21.547 estudiantes.
Luego, debes poner cuidado a la hora de poner en duda la representatividad
de nuestras autoridades.
Por otra parte, te contaré que con un grupo de profesionales hacemos charlas
de liderazgo y motivación.
Nuestros precios son módicos y por eso tenemos trabajo.
¡Hasta nos hemos dado el lujo de no cobrar cuando hemos estado en escuelas
públicas pobres y en la más absoluta orfandad!
Nos moldeamos a la realidad chilena y cobramos lo justo.
Ahora he sabido que tú también das charlas de liderazgo.
¡Bienvenida la competencia!
Pero cobrar $1.800.000 (un millón 800 mil pesos) por charla, ¿no te parece
un precio prohibitivo para muchos que desean conocerte y escucharte?
¿No estarás abusando de tu minuto de fama?
¿Por qué abominas tanto de las leyes del mercado pero las aplicas a tu favor
cuando te conviene para el lucro personal?
¿No es destruir el ominoso lucro lo que te motiva a dar la cara?
¿En qué quedamos?
Entiendo la impulsividad de la juventud, pero hay que ponerle atajo. Es
cierto que el que no se equivoca nunca, es porque nunca hace nada. El
problema es que ustedes partieron al revés. Por estar mucho tiempo sin hacer
nada, viven equivocándose.
The truth is that Camila Vallejo did not get voted in to be FECH president by the majority of University students, only about 700 students for her and that is it. The majority of Chilean students do the hands on work organizing and protesting in the street while Ms Vallejo poses for the camera. Camila Vallejo may appear to care but one can simply research Jaime Garjardo or any other Labor Union member, or Education Minister and you will find that Camila has only said things about education reform that he has already said many times over many years. There is nothing new nor innovative nor "rebellious" from Ms. Vallejo. We do not enjoy speaking out about this because it may seem indifferent or mean, but it is Ms. Vallejo who has continued to present an untrue and unfair image of herself while the rest of us students do all of the work and organizing. I don't care about their Communist JJCC (Juventudes Comunistas de Chile) agenda except for the fact that the media has taken the false Guardian article and presented complete lies. "The student who can shut down a city" Guardian article was August 24-25 and it was CUT who issued the mass strike and it was CUT who shut down a city. Camila has not mobilized anyone or anything, except for trying to get her picture taken at the right time, you will not see Camila on the street protesting, I mean, give me a break, thousands of students cannot even shut down a city. Is Ms. Vallejo shining the light of education reform or on herself and Communist agenda? Camila hasn't even mentioned all of the REAL REBELS, like the Chilean high school students who were on a hunger strike starving themselves to death for education, like the ordinary people fighting in the streets because they do not have mommy and daddy to hand them everything, like the Labor Unions who have been for years fighting for education and constitutional reform for a better Chile. Camila Vallejo attended private school her whole life and has never even had a job. She is 24 years old, that is not young, there are many younger working professionals already in the Labor Union who are professors and teachers and have families. There is nothing wrong with being blessed, Ms. Vallejo's parents pay for her education and pay for her whole livelihood and her boyfriend, fellow Communist and former FECH president Julio Sarmiento, is also middle to upper class. Nothing wrong with this, but luxury does not really create an authentic rebel. It is great she has never had to struggle or even have a job by her adult age - but how does this make her a rebel? Mr. Sarmiento has spent alot of time behind the scenes acting as a publicist promoting Camila and contacting media outlets. Camila does indeed charge over $3, 900 for a speaking engagement - let me put it this way, thousands of students have spoken out against Camila Vallejo's hypocrisy but they are threatened by JJCC Communist party. This note on Facebook is the truth. Camila Vallejo did not even get voted in to FECH by the majority vote of the student population. All you have to do is read and view the JJCC website and you will discover that they are extremely devoted to their Communist cause. Camila Vallejo and Julio Sarmiento have worked hard to promote and sell Camila's image in order to present a new "Brand" and a new way of marketing JJCC Communist party. You will read on the JJCC that they try to dispel the myths around Communism and that they "do not eat babies." What better way to dispel the myth than to create the notion of a "rebel" but it is all typical common protest propaganda to gain attention to a cause, and in this case, ultimately the cause is for JJCC. Read the JJC website. What do you know about Communism? Did you “buy” what they are “selling?” Have you bought into the image so much that it makes you forget that it is for Communist agenda. Does it present a kinder gentler brand of Communism to you? Has it destroyed your image of the fat old mean baby eating man Communist? Mission accomplished. |
|
|
Post your Comment
|
|
|
