|
| WeFixBadCredit.org wefixbadcredit.org Scam Fraud Extortion Theft Criminal Activity Stealing peoples person information, Internet |
| 1st of Feb, 2013 by User764825 |
Be careful of this MAN! wefixbadcredit.org This guy will talk you into signing up with his so called FIX your CREDIT and perform miracles services only to try to destroy you and your families lives. I approached this man who goes by the ALIAS FRANKY his real name is Francis J Monahan III This guy is a nightmare! A HACKER! SCAMMER! Liar and a thief! He will tell you this big long tale show you some video he made and how he met President Obama and how he's related to The Domino's Pizza Family. All of this is LIES!!!!!!! He will offer a free trial credit report. You think your filling out a normal credit report but it's actually him stealing your information. He claims he can raise your credit score by 100 points to 200 points all legally again all lies. Once he doesn't get what he wants from you he will STALK YOU, CALL you 24 hours a day, GIVE OUT YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER TO PEOPLE. Here is a link to his youtube channel. http://www.youtube.com/user/NorthRpgBay BEWARE this man will try to steal everything you own! We found out he is wanted by many state goverments for all sorts of charges. If you know his whereabouts please report them to the FBI or Law Enforcement. Attached is his picture and real identity. He will try to hack you, spoof your phone number to make it seem like your harrassing your friends and family, clients etc. BEWARE!!!!! National Credit Alliance Corporation
Postal Box 222
Portage, IN 46368
Update Office
Telephone: 1-219-840-0924
Fax: 1-317-663-1122
[email protected]
Sales Office
Telephone: 1-219-840-0610
Www.WeFixBadCredit.Org
****************************************************************** God Bless and BE CAREFUL OF THESE INTERNET SCAMMERS LIKE THIS GUY!
|
|
|
|
|
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Released
Movie Name
1st Weekend
US Gross
Worldwide Gross
Budget
3/31/1999 The Matrix $27, 788, 331 $171, 479, 930 $460, 279, 930 $65, 000, 000
5/15/2003 The Matrix Reloaded $91, 774, 413 $281, 553, 689 $738, 576, 929 $127, 000, 000
11/5/2003 The Matrix Revolutions $48, 475, 154 $139, 259, 759 $424, 259, 759 $110, 000, 000
Totals $592, 293, 378 $1, 623, 116, 618 $302, 000, 000
Averages $197, 431, 126 $541, 038, 873 $100, 666, 667
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Se |
|
|
|
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks |
|
|
|
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks |
|
|
|
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early recordings did not have matrix numbers, and some record labels—such as Victor, for its American-made recordings—would keep their matrix numbers secret and/or obliterate the numbers that had been present on other publishers' pressings.
Matrix numbers continued to be used on LPs and even CDs, but they have special significance for 78's, as they are the one and only sure way of identifying a particular performance. Editing was essentially impossible in those days, and a side had to be recorded intact. The matrix number was stamped onto the master disc when the recording was made, and when the master was copied, so was the matrix number.
This number is vital information to collectors of old records, because:
Sometimes, different takes were issued under the same manufacturer catalog number. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that the records were in fact different.
Sometimes, the same take was re-issued under another label, perhaps even with the names of the performers changed. Only by examining the matrix numbers would one know that they were in fact the same recording.
Matrix numbers were generally assigned consecutively. One can assume that, if the matrix numbers of a set are put into numerical sequence, one will know the order in which the sides were recorded. In most numbering systems, there was a suffix on the end of the number which identified the "take". To give a simple example, consider the 1927 Trial By Jury. Here are the details of that set, arranged in the order recorded:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc11602-2 Hark, the hour of ten is sounding 20 Sep 27
2 Cc11603-2 When first my old, old love I knew 20 Sep 27
3 Cc11644-2 For these kind words accept my thanks 29 Sep 27
4 Cc11604-2 Swear thou the Jury! 20 Sep 27
5 Cc11645-2 Oh never, never, never 29 Sep 27
6 Cc11646-1 That she is reeling is plain to see! 29 Sep 27
7 Cc11606-2 A nice dilemma we have here 20 Sep 27
8 Cc11605-2 The question, gentlemen, is one of liquor 20 Sep 27
We see here that five sides were recorded on September 20th, 1927, the remaining three on September 29th. The "-2" suffix on all but the last matrix number indicates a second take.
Sometimes, examination of the matrix numbers and recording dates allows one to piece together some of the circumstances under which a set was made. For example, the 1930 Patience was recorded on 22 sides, and 21 of them were recorded between September 24th and October 8th, 1930. However, side 13 ("I hear the soft note...") was recorded on November 9th. Its matrix number is Cc19798-6, suggesting that six takes were needed. Normally, one would not schedule a session to record just one side, so it's safe to assume that the original sessions failed to produce an acceptable take, so the company had to be assembled to redo it.
A similar case is presented by the 1929 Pirates, where details are as follows:
Side
Nbr Matrix
Number Selection Rec.
Date
1 Cc15910-9A Overture, part 1 15 May 29
2 Cc15921-1A Overture, part 2 21 Feb 29
3 Cc15911-5 Pour, oh pour the pirate sherry 19 Apr 29
4 Cc15943-5 Oh, better far to live and die 25 Mar 29
... ... ... etc. ... ... ...
Every side of this recording, except for 1 and 3, was recorded between February 21st and March 25th, 1929. The unusually high number of takes for sides 1 and 3 suggests that some problem was encountered, forcing the company to return to the studio at a later date.
The seven operas D'Oyly Carte recorded in 1949–50 (the mono sets with Martyn Green et al) were originally issued on 78rpm records. However, Decca was by now using a different system, and the sequence of matrix numbers no longer signified the order in which the items were recorded.
Explanation of Matrix Numbers
[Editor's Note: This brief explanation of matrix numbers has been superseded by Howard S. Friedman's detailed article, Matrix and Catalog Numbers in G&S Discography. However, it has been retained on the site as a shorter discussion of the topic.]
Almost every 78rpm side ever recorded has a matrix number. The number was normally etched onto the ungrooved surface near the center of each side of the disc. However, some very early re |
|
|
Post your Comment
|
|
|
