Today’s Women Need To Come With Warning Labels
Now that modern day society has forced humankind to obtain licenses for carrying virtually every type of weapon imaginable, it is now only fitting that today’s modern day woman, having now been thoroughly brainwashed to “weaponize” their sexuality with the assistance of Joe Biden and Bill Clinton’s draconian unconstitutional VAWA law sponsored and pushed by organized feminism, incarcerating or ruining the life of any man at will, for any reason, even if there is no evidence, that women now be required to state their intentions and just who they are, up front.
It is no secret to men that have successfully slept with many women, universally report that the vast majority of women appreciate and prefer a man that takes control, in life as well as sexually, as a formal and open display of their manhood and societal dominance.
Indeed, most woman report that nothing turns off the vast majority of them than a sniveling, cowardly, unconfident man that can’t make decisions and act in a forthright, direct manner.
But the small minority of angry women calling themselves feminists have completely hijacked the women’s movement through psuedo-CIA and western intelligence mechanisms and front groups like the National Organization of Women (“NOW”), Planned Parenthood, and other extremist feminist hate groups, who falsely screech and claim that basically all sexual acts and interpersonal relationships by and between men and women within their families, relationships, corporate working environments, and every other arena of human interaction are characterized by violence, abuse, disrespect, hostility and criminality.
It is also no secret that these “women’s organizations” are funded and controlled by predominantly male oligarch entities to suspend male civil rights and liberties, and to destroy the nuclear family to make everyone (men, women, and their children) more dependent on the state (which they control), in every capacity.
So it should not be surprising or shocking to the conscience that men should be able to know, in advance, if the woman that they are dating or working with, is either one of the vast majority of females who appreciate strength, dominance, and chivalry, or if they in fact prefer a beta male that would never think of offending a woman, if even slightly.
One novel idea would be the color coding of women’s driver licenses, a completely voluntary decision by that women, to indicate if she likes aggressive, dominant, decisive men, or if she is on the other side of the spectrum, preferring “cuck-like men,” who are only a few steps from being girls, themselves.
The color codes for these women’s ID cards could theoretically go from “red” (dominant) all the way to “blue” (submissive), with varying degrees of hues in between, indicating their preference.
This forensic self-identifying voluntary information could then be used as only one of the “mitigating factors” tending to exonerate an otherwise innocent male against an opportunistic, nasty, fraudulent woman who intends to nail that man to the wall in the case of a possible divorce proceeding, child custody or visitation battle, in family court, or in a criminal case where that woman intends to impugn the integrity and character of that targeted male to rob and destroy him in those court proceedings.
This “color-coded” ID system could also help men avoid women that are trouble-makers from the get-go, instead of potentially wasting months, if not years, of being “duped” into thinking and believing that the woman that he is with is the “greatest thing since sliced bread,” only to have the equally proverbial “rug pulled out from under him” if and when things go south.
This type of color-coding self-identification would go miles to save the males, ensure family integrity, defend against false or spurious allegations of domestic abuse or violence, and ultimately would ensure transparency for all parties involved, and to avoid future disagreements and unpleasantness in the future, saving the courts and the world trillions of dollars in unnecessary costs and heartache. |
