| sueli costa (now doing business under opera by sueli costa llc) |
| sueli costa has a large NYS civil court judgment against her for bad manufacturing |
| 25th of Jul, 2011 by karmabeach |
SUELI COSTA HAS STARTED A PATHETIC SMEAR CAMPAIGN TRYING TO GET PEOPLE NOT TO NOTICE THAT SHE HAS A LARGE (OVER $34K DOLLAR COURT JUDGMENT AGAINST HER FOR:
BAD MANUFACTURING AND BUSINESS PRACTICES
FAILURE TO EXCHANGE DEFECTIVE MERCHANDISE SENT BY HER
FAILURE TO REFUND FOR DEFECTIVE MERCHANDISE SENT BY HER
FAILURE TO SHIP ORDER AS AGREED
FAILURE TO SHIP ORDER WHEN AGREED
FAILURE TO SHIP ORDER AT ALL (PART OF THE ORDER WAS NEVER SHIP)
SHE WANTS PEOPLE TO BELIEVE THAT 5 NYS CIVIL COURT JUDGES WERE "DUPED" INTO FINDING HER RESPONSIBLE. SHE WANTS PEOPLE TO BELIEVE SHE IS A VICTIM, WELL, WHY DONT YOU GO HERE TO SEE WHAT SUELI COSTA IS REALLY ABOUT:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Opera-Fashion-Group-Sueli-Costa-Have-Unpaid-Court-Judgment-Against-Them/101042889978236
WWW.OPERASUELICOSTA.BLOGSPOT.COM
WHAT SUELI COSTA HAS NO EXPLANATION FOR IS:
why you have closed your bank accounts
why your mail comes back as "moved left no address"
why you have removed your physical address from your website
why you have incorporated so many entities in the last two years since the lawsuit:
opera by sueli costa llc
opera fashion group llc
opera fashion group inc
opera swimwear (brand)
gabikini (brand)
bossa beach (brand)
for someone with such a small company you have more aliases than the coca-cola company LOL LOL LOL
im not afraid of you sueli costa (and aliases! :)
WHY YOU NEVER FILED A PROPER APPEAL IF YOU WERE "INNOCENT"? (BECAUSE SHE HAD TO ENTER THE AMOUNT OF THE JUDGMENT IN A COURT CONTROLLED ACCOUNT IN ORDER TO APPEAL) AND SHE WASNT ABOUT TO DO THAT BECAUSE SHE KNEW SHE WOULD LOSE. SHE HAD A LAWYER AND STILL LOST! THE EVIDENCE AGAINST HER WAS TOO MUCH FOR ANY OF THE JUDGES TO IGNORE!
the court documents speak for themselves!!! you can say what you want, the truth is people email me all the time to thank me because i saved them from doing business with you, because they have seen the court documents online and saw the proof for themselves...
YOU MAY THIN THAT IM THE ONE TO BLAME, BUT THE COURT JUDGMENT AND COURT DOCUMENTS ARE THE ONES THAT HAVE DONE YOU IN SUELI COSTA, NOT ME! YOU DID THIS TO YOURSELF BECAUSE:
YOU WERE A BAD MANUFACTURER
YOU WOULDNT EXCHANGE BADLY MADE MERCHANDISE
YOU REFUSED TO ACCEPT RETURNS
YOU REFUSED TO DEAL WITH THE SITUATION
YOU CLOSED YOUR BANK ACCOUNTS
YOU WOULDNT RETURN PHONE CALLS AND EMAIL
YOU WOULDNT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY AND BLAMED YOUR EMPLOYEES (we have your emails!)
SO FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE, STOP THE LIES WOULD YOU?
GO HERE TO READ WHAT SUELI COSTA IS REALLY ABOUT:
shani, or should i say sueli? hahaha wow you need to learn how to type in Enlish Sueli, all your comments under many names look the same, very bad grammar! hahaha
now, sueli costa works under many aliases:
opera fashion group inc
opera fashion group llc
opera by sueli costa llc
opera swimwear
bossa beach
gabikini
beware, you never know who you are doing business with when you deal with this woman. a court of law in New York found her liable, resonsible and guilty of not furnishing orders. im not the one saying this, a court of law IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IS!
READ ALL ABOUT IT HERE:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Opera-Fashion-Group-Sueli-Costa-Have-Unpaid-Court-Judgment-Against-Them/101042889978236
YOU CAN SEE ALL THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS AGAINST SUELI COSTA (NOW DOING BUSINESS UNDER OPERA BY SUELI COSTA LLC) AND OPERA FASHION GROUP INC THERE.
SUELI COSTA (AND ALL THE NAMES SHE USES TO DEFEND HERSELF ONLINE :) CAN COME HERE AND SAY WHAT SHE WANTS, BUT THE TRUTH IS SIMPLE:
SHE HAS A LARGE COURT JUDGMENT AGAINST HER AND HER COMPANY (THAT COMPANY IS STILL INCORPORATED IN FLORIDA)
SHE HAS MANY MANY INCORPORATIONS FOR JUST ONE COMPANY
SHE HAS CLOSE MANY BANK ACCOUNTS (GO TO THE LINK TO SEE: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Opera-Fashion-Group-Sueli-Costa-Have-Unpaid-Court-Judgment-Against-Them/101042889978236
SHE HAS MOVED FROM MANY ADDRESSES
SHE HAS REMOVED HER PHYSICAL ADDRESS FROM HER WEBSITE
SHE IS HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT
DONT BELIEVE WORDS, GO HERE AND SEE THE PROOF WITH YOUR OWN EYES:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Opera-Fashion-Group-Sueli-Costa-Have-Unpaid-Court-Judgment-Against-Them/101042889978236
THE FACT THAT SUELI COSTA ISNT HERE TO DEFEND HERSELF BUT THESE "RAMDOM" ALIASES DO SHOULD TELL YOU SOMETHING!
BY THE WAY, IF ALL THESE LEGAL DOCUMENTS WERENT REAL, SUELI COSTA WOULD HAVE SUED ME FOR SLANDER A LOOOOOOONG TIME AGO... THE DOCUMENTS ARE 1000% REAL.. SO ARE THE CHARGES AND SO IS THE VERDICT! DONT BELIEVE SUELI COSTA, SHE IS A CONSUMATED LIAR!
SUELI COSTA CAN SAY WHAT SHE WANTS ABOUT ME... THE TRUTH IS, COURT DOCUMENTS DO NOT LIE, COURT DOCUMENTS SPEAK VOLUMES, YOU CANT "DUPE" EXPERIENCED NYS COURT JUDGES WITH TALL TALES (THATS WHAT SHE WANTS PEOPLE TO BELIEVE) THE FACT IS, SHE IS THE ONE WITH THE COURT JUDGMENT AGAINST HER.
SOON I WILL POST THE COURT TRANSCRIPT SO YOU CAN READ SUELI COSTA'S OWN WORDS DURING THE TRIAL, AND YOU WILL SEE WHAT SHES REALLY ABOUT.
SUELI COSTA WANTS TO SMEAR ME WITH IDIOTIC REMARKS ABOUT MY LIFE (OR THE LIFE SHE WANTS PEOPLE TO BELIEVE I LEAD) IF THATS THE ONLY THING SHE CAN COME UP WITH RATHER THAN PROOF OF HER INNOCENCE THEN PEOPLE, DONT BE FOOLED BY A CON ARTIST WITH A COURT JUDGMENT AGAINST HER!
SHE COULDNT FOOL THE COURT, DONT LET HER FOOL YOU! |
|
|
|
|
HERE IS WHAT THE JUDGE IN NEW YORK HAS TO SAY ABOUT SUELI COSTA AND OPERA FASHION GROUP:
(PS IF SHES INNOCENT WHY DID SHE CLOSE HER BANK ACCOUNTS AND CHANGED HER COMPANY NAME AND INCORPORATION? SEE PROOF OF ALL THAT IN MY FACEBOOK GROUP!)
SEE A COPY OF THE ACTUAL COURT JUDGMENT HERE:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Opera-Fashion-Group-Sueli-Costa-Have-Unpaid-Court-Judgment-Against-Them/101042889978236
CIVIL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PARK 65
NILSA FACCHI
Plaintiff,
AGAINST
SUELI COSTA AND OPERA FASHION GROUP INC
Defendant
INDEX NO 35989 CVN 2009
DECISION AND JUDGMENT
Plaintiff claims is for $25, 000 with interest from July 15, 2009 for failure to provide proper services, failure to return money, and for alleged breach of contract.
Plaintiff entered into an oral contract with defendant in October 2008, which she agreed to design and produce swimwear. A deposit of $2, 00 in cash was paid to the defendant and $ 32, 500 for payment of services. Plaintiff claims the first shipment of merchandise received was dirty, brandless and unfinished. She immediately mailed the shipment back to the defendant. A second shipment was received, the the problems persisted.
Defendant claims that errors did occur in the first shipment, but she agreed to take them back and made the necessary changes. She claims that plaintiffs failure to select a name for the merchandise and demanding constant changes resulted in delays to the second shipment. Defendant claims the fist shipment was corrected and remailed to the plaintiff.
To establish a claim for breach of contract under New York Law, a plaintiff must prove the folowing in order to claim damages:
1. A valid and enforceable contract;
2. Performance of the contrary by one party;
3. Breach by the other party, and
4. Damages
(Furia v Furia, 116 A.D. 2d 694, 695 (App. Div. 2d 1986)
The oral testimony and exhibits submitted to this court establish that in October, 2008, plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral contract. The contract terms were for design and manufacturing of swimwear. Plaintiff paid a $2, 000.00 deposit and $32, 500.00 for services rendered. The first order received b the plaintiff from the defendant was dirty, unfinished, and brandless. She immediately returned the order and defendant admits errors in the first shipment. Defendant failed to demonstrate that she sent conforming goods consistent with the terms of the contract in the second order. She also sent an email on July 24, 2009, to the plaintiff stating "I WILL NO LONGER ACCEPT ANY RETURN OR CANCELLATION" of merchandise (See Plaintiff Exhiibit 4), therefore, defendant breached the contract.
Plaintiff's testimony and exhibits proved damages. She was sent non-conforming goods, which did not meet the terms of the contract. An email was sent by defendant to plaintiff stating no longer would accept any returns or cure the defects in the goods, therefore, it is the decision and judgment of this court that plaintiff has proven damages and is entitled to $25, 000 with intetest from July 15, 2009.
Accordingly, for the above stated reasons the plaintiff is awarded damages in the amount of $25, 000.00 with interest from July 15, 2009.
This constitutes the decision and judgment of this court.
Dated June 28, 2009
Manuel J Mendez
Judge Civil Court |
|
|
Post your Comment
|
|
|
