LAW AND ASSOCIATES LLC, CLEARWATER FLORIDA |
Massachusetts Halts False Foreclosure "Rescue" Activity Firm claimed to be "non-profit" |
11th of Aug, 2011 by dmcnulty |
Massachusetts Halts False Foreclosure "Rescue" Activity
Firm claimed to be "non-profit"
June 22, 2009
One by one, the state of Massachusetts is targeting firms that claim they can
"rescue" distressed homeowners from impending foreclosure. The Massachusetts Attorney
Generals office has obtained a preliminary injunction against defendants H.O.P.E.
Alliance, Inc., (H.O.P.E. Alliance), Law & Associates, LLC and Thomas E. Law, II.
The preliminary injunction prohibits the defendants from publishing advertisements
concerning foreclosure-related services, contacting Massachusetts consumers regarding
foreclosures or mortgages, and taking and/or soliciting advance fees from consumers.
The preliminary injunction follows a temporary restraining order granted against the
defendants in early June.
In a complaint centers on the all-too-common practice of soliciting unlawful advance
fees for foreclosure-related services, and unnecessarily delayed negotiations
regarding loan modifications. The two together, says Massachusetts Attorney General
Martha Coakley, usually pushes homeowners further into debt.
The complaint also alleges that H.O.P.E. Alliance, with the help of co-defendants Law
& Associates, LLC, and Thomas E. Law, II, solicited homeowners facing foreclosure by
sending letters that directed them to a toll-free number and to the website
www.helpnowalliance.org.
The website states that it is an alliance of nonprofit organizations and housing
counselors that can assist homeowners in obtaining a loan modification or stopping
foreclosure. The website also states that it is a 501 (c) (3) non-profit
organization.
"H.O.P.E. Alliance is not registered with the IRS or the Attorney General's Office as
a non-profit," Coakley said. The Attorney General's complaint also asserts that in
its letter to homeowners, H.O.P.E. Alliance deceptively used a similar name to the
government-sponsored non-profit organization, HOPE NOW Alliance.
During telephone calls with consumers, defendants apparently attempted to skirt the
law by asking for a "donation" instead of a fee, but Coakley says the request is
still an unlawful fee. Defendants also allegedly promised to obtain loan
modifications for consumers, and then after months of delay either failed to provide
any services or only provided inadequate assistance to homeowners. |
|
|
Post your Comment
|
|
|