|
| Complaint Review: Abelard Construction | Notice: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the |
| 12th of Sep, 2012 by User596666 |
| RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR DECISION Abelard Construction, LLC, Complainant v. Jared Boergadine (aka “KidCorrect”), Author of Ripoff Report #940766 ________________________________________________________________ Complainant Abelard Construction, LLC (the “Complainant”), challenged the truthfulness of certain statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author Jared Boergadine (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com on September 13, 2012, as Ripoff Report No. 940766 (the “Report”). The Author contends the Complainant engaged in shoddy construction practices and does not pay its employees for work performed. The Complainant denies the allegations and states that the Author is a former disgruntled independent contractor who has made false allegations against the company. While the Author did not submit a response to the Complaint through the VIP Arbitration Process, the Author did provided an Affidavit in which he disavows the allegations made in the Report. By submitting a Report and a Complaint on the Ripoff Report website, both the Complainant and the Author have agreed to submit the dispute to the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration. Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for the determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint pursuant to the Arbitration Rules. The Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted established that each Statement is true or that it is false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false. The Arbitrator determined that certain statements in the challenged Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted. ________________________________________________________________ Bruce E. Meyerson, Arbitrator Decided March 28, 2013 * A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail [email protected] with the name of the Complainant and Report number. (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)))! (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). |
|
|
|
Post your Comment
|
|
|
