Catch it |
Catch it on Camera.com Dean Love love it corperation Dean love from Winnipeg Manitoba sells equipment from a company called catch it on camera that h |
29th of Mar, 2011 by User226602 |
Dean Love From catch it on camera winnipeg Manitoba sells you recording security equipment that he can access remotely and shut down your services unknowingly to you and then charge you service calls.. Dean love From catch it on camera is a known computer hacker in winnipeg canada ,,nationwide he was sued by direct satellite service and charged by the Royal Canadian Police hacking and other illegal things .. Dean Love from catch it on camera or love it enterprize has a long history of frauding people in Winnipeg and Canada as well people of the united states.. Do you want a person like that monitering your activities possible allowing thieves into your property.. |
|
|
Dean Love from Winnipeg Manitoba from Catch it on Camera, , , , , was convicted of drug dealing and is still addicted to cocaine, , , do not trust him as he will moniter your activities by camera and record your activities and then due to his Drug addiction he may rob you when you are not home ...love it corporation is the fraud artist and his equipment is not certified locally, , , , Dean Love is a camera Fraud artist DO NOT TRUST THIS MAN |
|
|
THANK YOU RAY FOR LEAVING THE TRACEABLE VOICE MAIL THAT WILL CAUSE YOUR FAT ASS TO GET SUED FOR LIBEL. HOPE YOU HAVE A GOOD LAWYER!
To the rest of you who know me, you all know that this is false information from a jealous loser who got busted in a scam. |
|
|
Dean Love of Catchitoncamera.com, , Ripped me off too, , he sold me a camera moniterring system for security surveillance in Winnipeg, , Manitoba, for just under 400.00 plus installation ...the installation was over 2000.00 ???, , he never gave me a quote on install, just said plus install, when I questioned him about the bill..and service charges he told me that if I did not agree he would put lien on my personal house, and then take my house away and shut down my security camera, when I contacted my lawyer he told me that if you check the court registry of the Manitoba Court of Queens Bench and google the Dean Love, you will find he is a drug dealer charged by federal authorities and a computer hacker charged . He also advertises threw a news letter coffee time news that a great deal of unsuspecting senior citizens read...so please be aware of loveit corperation, Dean Love aka security and investigations expert the only thing this Dean love Guy his office is located on 485 St. Anne's road do not give this guy access to your internet security system ask him or anyone for a criminal record check.Dean Love. |
|
|
Dean Love sold me some of those satellite cards that he illegally haCKED INTO DIRECT SATELLITE TELEVISION to and they never worked, , he owes me 150.00 as far as Im concerned ..nOW HE SELLS CAMERA RECORDING EQUIPMENT AND MANAGES MONEY MAYBE HE CAN MANAGE TO PAY ME MINE, , , THIEF |
|
|
Catch it on Camera or Dean Love put key loggers on my computer my computer tech found that he put that on my computer so he could access all my passwords..do not trust him, , , he is KNOWN TO POLICE... |
|
|
More false posts by the one and only mr ray rybachuk. Perhaps you don't know this ray but all of your posts can be traced back to you through your ip. And it is plainly obvious when you create multiple posts using different names but make the same spelling grammar errors in your posts that they are all from the same person (no I won't tell you what they are but the rest of us who can speak an write English can see them).
Keep digging your little hole deeper and deeper.
You WILL be hearing from a lawyer soon as you cannot make false statements knowing other people are going to read them. I can say you are a convicted drug dealer. Because it's true. You could even say I was a satellite hacker, that is true too. But when you make allegations of fraud and theft and spying which you know are false, that is something you CAN and will be sued for. Particularly when it is done for the sole purpose of damaging my business.
Have a wonderful day Raymond J. Rybachuk. |
|
|
DEAN LOVE IS A CONVICTED DRUG DEALER WHO IS KNOWN TO POLICE DO NOT TRUST CATCHIT ON CAMERA OWNER DEAN LOVE WHO SOMETIME USES THE NAME LOVEI.T. CLYDE BOND THE FEDERAL CROWN ATTOURNEY TOOK YOU DOWN ONCE FOR DRUG DEALING AND HE WILL CATCH YOU AGAIN DEAN LOVE OWNER OF CATCH IT ON CAMERA IS KNOWN TO POLICE AND HAS BEEN MONITERED BY THE POLICE FOR HIS ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES |
|
|
Nice Try Raymond J Rybachuk. In fact it appears Mr. Clyde Bond actually spent a fair bit of time pursuing you! Here is just ONE of the many decisions going against you from your long criminal career (which apparently besides cocaine dealing also included money laundering):
COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF MANITOBA
BETWEEN:
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,
) For the Respondent:
) Karen Molle
Respondent,
) Anne Krahn
)
- and -
) For the (Accused) Applicant:
) Gerald S. Ashcroft
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK,
)
) Judgment delivered:
(Accused) Applicant.
) August 28, 2001
MONNIN, J.
[1] The accused, Raymond James Rybachuk, has been committed for trial on an indictment alleging that, between January 1, 1992 and March 18, 1997, he was in possession of proceeds of crime and was laundering proceeds of crime. Those charges are set out in a two-count indictment dated June 23, 1999.
[2] Mr. Rybachuk has entered the special pleas of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict for each of those counts. His position is that he was previously tried on a four-count indictment alleging that he was trafficking in cocaine and was in possession of proceeds of crime from that trafficking, which counts dealt with events occurring within the period of time covered in the indictment currently before this court. On those two counts of possession of proceeds of crime, he was convicted on one and acquitted on the other.
[3] On the motion before me, Mr. Rybachuk submits that he ought not to stand trial on the pending charge of possess proceeds of crime because:
(a) at the previous trial, he was on trial for charges, in whole or in part, that were the same as the current charge;
(b) the principle of res judicata and issue estoppel apply;
(c) in all the circumstances, it would be an abuse of process to proceed with the charge; and
(d) it would be in violation of s. 11(h) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were he to stand trial for this charge as well.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
[4] The first trial, which led to the conviction and acquittal that Mr. Rybachuk raises in his special pleas, originally proceeded on four counts. They related to two transactions, which the Crown alleged occurred on December 10, 1996 and on January 27, 1997. The Crown alleged that Mr. Rybachuk sold cocaine to a civilian agent working for the police at the time. With each count of trafficking was a charge of possession of proceeds of crime, namely, the amounts Mr. Rybachuk received for the alleged sales.
[5] The trial proceeded by judge and jury. Mr. Rybachuk was convicted with respect to the transaction of December 10, 1996, on both the trafficking and possession charges. He was acquitted with respect to the transaction of January 27, 1997, on both the trafficking and possession charges.
[6] The current indictment alleges possession of proceeds of crime and laundering proceeds of crime between January 1, 1992 and March 18, 1997. The court has been informed by the Crown on this motion that the allegations are based on evidence collected by the R.C.M.P., including accounting evidence of a forensic accountant. That evidence will attempt to show a discrepancy between the amounts spent by Mr. Rybachuk and his income from known sources during the period of time covered in the indictment. The Crown alleges that the amounts spent in excess of revenue are proceeds of Mr. Rybachuk’s involvement in the ongoing importation and distribution of cocaine. The Crown has informed me that the amounts referred to in the first indictment are not included in the amounts used by the forensic accountant in support of the second indictment.
[7] In addition to financial forensic accounting evidence, the Crown will call evidence of individuals allegedly purchasing cocaine on behalf of Mr. Rybachuk in the United States and evidence showing how the cocaine was brought back to Canada. As well, the Crown wishes to re-introduce evidence of the civilian undercover police agent with respect to her involvement with Mr. Rybachuk, including evidence concerning the two transactions that form the basis of the first indictment.
AUTREFOIS ACQUIT AND AUTREFOIS CONVICT: SPECIAL PLEAS
[8] Section 607 of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46, allows an accused to plead special pleas of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict in answer to charges. Sections 608 and 609 set out the evidence that is to be considered and the general rules for determination of the issue of identity between the previous charges and the charges that the accused stands committed. The procedure provides that the pleas are to be disposed of by judge without jury before the accused is called on to plead further. The pleas are only available if the offences are “the same in whole or in part”. The prior charges must have been substantially the same, both factually and legally.
[9] In R. v. Van Rassel, 1990 CanLII 124 (S.C.C.), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 225 at 234-35, one of the leading cases with respect to the plea of autrefois acquit, McLachlin J., as she then was, set out the conditions which must be met by the accused to avail himself of the plea:
To make out the defence of autrefois acquit, the accused must show that the two charges laid against him are the same. In particular, he must prove that the following two conditions have been met:
(1) the matter is the same, in whole or in part; and
(2) the new count must be the same as at the first trial, or be implicitly included in that of the first trial, either in law or on account of the evidence presented if it had been legally possible at that time to make the necessary amendments.
… [I]t must be recognized that the plea of autrefois acquit is based on the principle of justice and fairness and that the Criminal Code does not require that the charges be absolutely identical. Despite the technical form of the relevant sections of the Criminal Code, the substantive point is a simple one: could the accused have been convicted at the first trial of the offence with which he is now charged?
[10] Mr. Rybachuk’s position is that the offences in the first indictment were the same, in whole or in part, as the pending charge of possession of proceeds of crime.
[11] The Crown disagrees, arguing that the two matters are not the same, in whole or in part, and that Mr. Rybachuk could not have been convicted at the first trial of the crime for which he is now charged.
[12] I agree with the Crown’s position that there is no identity of charges as required by the Criminal Code. The offence for which Mr. Rybachuk now stands charged is not in substance or in fact the same as the offences for which he was charged previously, convicted and acquitted. Were the Crown seeking to have the jury convict again on the proceeds arising from the two transactions which were the basis of the first trial, the argument might have merit. However, there is nothing preventing the Crown from adducing evidence of the previous conviction in support of its allegations that the substantial discrepancy between spending and income arises from trafficking in cocaine.
[13] As to the acquittal, other considerations apply, but they do not change the determination of the special pleas raised at this stage. Accordingly, Mr. Rybachuk’s pleas of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict are not accepted, and Mr. Rybachuk will be required to enter pleas to the two counts in the indictment.
RES JUDICATA AND ISSUE ESTOPPEL
[14] In the alternative, Mr. Rybachuk has argued that res judicata and issue estoppel are available to him and the Crown should be estopped from re?litigating any issue decided with respect to the offences of December 10, 1996 and January 27, 1997 relating to possession of proceeds of crime.
[15] There is a distinction between the special pleas referred to previously and the common law defence of res judicata or issue estoppel. Issue estoppel, which is part of the doctrine of res judicata, refers to the principle that when an issue of fact has been determined in a previous proceeding, the issue cannot be litigated again between the same parties in a future lawsuit. See Regina v. Owens, [1970] 2 C.C.C. 38 at 43-44 (B.C. C.A.).
[16] In order to successfully raise the defence, the accused must satisfy the court that, in the earlier proceedings, there was a determination of a question of fact in favour of the accused vital to the later charge and which operates as an estoppel against the Crown so as to bar the later prosecution. The requirements for issue estoppel are that:
(a) the judicial determination involved a determination of the same question as that sought to be determined in the litigation in which estoppel is raised;
(b) the judgment was final and made by a court of competent jurisdiction;
(c) the parties are the same.
[17] It should be noted that unlike the special pleas of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict, there is no plea of issue estoppel. It is a defence. It is part of the general plea of not guilty and the common law defences protected by the Criminal Code. See D.J. Lange, The Doctrine of Res Judicata in Canada (Toronto: Butterworths, 2000) at 267.
[18] Accordingly, issue estoppel must arise after a plea of not guilty. The proper procedure for making an application for an order of acquittal on the ground of issue estoppel is after all of the Crown’s evidence has been adduced as only then will the trier of fact be able to determine whether there has been a determination of the same question in the first proceeding. See Canada (Attorney General) v. Ukrainetz, [1994] S.J. No. 1 (Q.B.) at para. 13.
[19] Therefore, it would appear that the request for an alternative determination of the motion based upon issue estoppel is premature, as it would be dependent upon the evidence that would be tendered before the court on this trial.
[20] However, I can assume, for the purposes of this motion, that there will be a plea of not guilty entered to the two charges based in part upon the issue of res judicata. While I will reserve the determination of whether issue estoppel applies to the end of the Crown’s evidence, I wish to deal with some of the issues raised by the parties at this time in order to provide them with some guidance of the evidentiary matters which will be before the court in the near future.
[21] The Crown has alleged that in order to raise issue estoppel, the question must be one that is decided in favour of the accused. It, therefore, argues that issue estoppel does not preclude adducing facts surrounding the conviction in the second trial.
[22] I agree. The evidence of a conviction in the first trial is properly evidence that the jury can be asked to consider with respect to the charges which Mr. Rybachuk now faces. It is not an attempt to re-litigate the issue, but rather to use the conviction as evidence for the purposes of determination of another issue, namely, whether Mr. Rybachuk was in possession of proceeds of crime or did utilize the funds in a manner contrary to the provisions of the Narcotic Control Act.
[23] As to the transaction of January 27, 1997, the Crown says it is not seeking in this prosecution a determination inconsistent with the findings of the first jury. It says that it is not seeking to re-litigate Mr. Rybachuk’s guilt or innocence with respect to the sale on that day. It is simply seeking to present it as evidence that the jury may accept or reject in order to consider the charges currently pending. It says that it is not seeking a determination of the same question as in the first trial. Therefore, the possibility of an inconsistent verdict is not triggered.
[24] The Crown’s argument raises the delicate issue of the use to be made of an acquittal. Based upon the evidence to date, including the transcripts I have read of the first trial and the judge’s charge to the jury, I am satisfied that the same issue is not going to be determined at this trial. However, the question of whether the Crown could lead evidence for the purpose of having the jury consider the evidence in a manner inconsistent with the findings made by a previous jury is troubling.
[25] In Grdic v. The Queen, 1985 CanLII 34 (S.C.C.), [1985] 1 S.C.R. 810 at 825-26, speaking on behalf of the majority, Lamer J. stated:
However, this does not mean that, for the purpose of the application of the doctrine of res judicata, the Crown is estopped from re-litigating all or any of the issues raised in the first trial. But it does mean that any issue, the resolution of which had to be in favour of the accused as a prerequisite to the acquittal, is irrevocably deemed to have been found conclusively in favour of the accused (see R. v. Carlson, [1970] 3 O.R. 213; contra, Villemaire v. The Queen (1962), 39 C.R. 297 at p. 300). This is so even though the judgment might well be the result of a reasonable doubt on that issue, and even when the judge has said so or expressed views that indicate clearly that his finding, though inuring to the benefit of the accused, had been arrived at with reluctance and the judge has suggested that it is not conclusively in favour of the accused.
[26] The Crown is admittedly seeking to tender the evidence of the transaction of January 27, 1997, for the purpose of having the jury accept it as evidence of criminal conduct, namely, the trafficking of drugs on the day in question. Otherwise, it has no relevance to the Crown’s case. Although the Crown is not seeking at the end of the day that the jury find Mr. Rybachuk guilty of trafficking in drugs on the day in question, it will be seeking to have it consider that transaction as evidence of Mr. Rybachuk’s involvement in drug trafficking. The jury could only do so by concluding that it was a drug transaction that occurred on the day in question. I have serious concerns that from an evidentiary viewpoint, the Crown can lead evidence seeking a finding that is inconsistent with the acquittal.
[27] The issue as it relates to the evidentiary issue has not been fully argued before me and I would allow the Crown the opportunity, before this evidence is attempted to be tendered, to have the matter more fully argued if it wishes to do so. However, at this time, I do not believe that the doctrine of issue estoppel prevents the case from proceeding on the basis of the indictment as it now stands.
[28] Mr. Rybachuk also raises an abuse of process, arguing that the Crown is unreasonably splitting a case. He relies upon R. v. Jewitt, 1985 CanLII 47 (S.C.C.), [1985] 2 S.C.R. 128 at 135, wherein Dickson C.J.C., speaking for the court, stated:
The Ontario Court of Appeal recently reviewed the authorities in R. v. Young (1984), 40 C.R. (3d) 289, per Dubin J.A., (Howland C.J.O. and Martin J.A. concurring) and concluded on p. 329:
I am satisfied on the basis of the authorities that I have set forth above that there is a residual discretion in a trial court judge to stay proceedings where compelling an accused to stand trial would violate those fundamental principles of justice which underlie the community’s sense of fair play and decency and to prevent the abuse of a court’s process through oppressive or vexatious proceedings.
[29] Relying also on Regina v. B reflex, (1986), 29 C.C.C. (3d) 365 at 375 (Ont. C.A.), the defence argues that, under certain circumstances, the splitting of a case may amount to an abuse of process. In that case, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that the splitting of a case could amount to an abuse of process:
(1) where the second trial is such that it will, in effect, force the accused to answer for the same delinquency twice; or
(2) where the second trial is such that it will, in effect, relitigate matters that have already been decided on the merits, raising the spectre of inconsistent verdicts; or
(3) where the second trial is brought because of malice or spite so as to harass the accused and not for any proper purpose.
[30] I accept the Crown’s argument that Mr. Rybachuk is not being asked to answer for the same delinquency twice. The evidence of possession of proceeds of crime is different and deals with different issues than those that were placed before the jury in the first trial. Apart from my comments raised with respect to the transaction of January 27, 1997, I agree that there is no attempt to re?litigate matters that have already been decided on the merits and there will be no issue of inconsistent verdicts. There is no evidence of malice on the part of the Crown in the prosecution.
[31] For these reasons, I do find no abuse of process in the laying of the second indictment.
[32] As to the argument that there is a breach of a Charter right, s. 11(h) of the Charter provides protection against being tried a second time for an offence for which one has been acquitted, or against being tried or punished again for an offence for which one has been found guilty and punished. I do not believe that Mr. Rybachuk, at this stage, has set out a breach of that protection. The prosecutions are not for offences for which he has been convicted or acquitted previously for the reasons I have set out above.
[33] The motion is therefore dismissed. |
|
|
This whole thing is pretty childish.
Was thinking about doing business with Dean Love but happened upon the scammer alert posted by Ray R.
I did seriously consider not making a purchase from Dave but once I looked into the the back and forth accusations it most certainly seems like Ray Rabachuck has several documented indiscretions and appears to be the slime ball in this battle.
Ya, I'll make the purchase from Dean, just hope he lets this all go!
G |
|
|
It was completely by accident that I stumbled onto this website and supposed report.
IMO this whole forum is seriously flawed in that I was able to post this and my previous post with a fake email address and no email verification.
It appears that this place is set up strictly for drama provided by unsubstantiated disgruntled people.
Is there a fix-your-reputation-for a-fee involved somewhere here?
G |
|
|
What a loser this DEan Love is he truly is a convict, , take a look
File Details
(CR91-01-10196 QUEEN vs LOVE, DEAN M.)
(CRIMINAL, DRUGS, FRAUD x2)
(204-945-0344)
DEAN Michael LOVE
Documents Filed (CR91-01-10196)
Doc
# Reg
Date Court
Location Document Notes
1 Apr 09 Winnipeg- QB INFORMATION & RECORD D.O.B. FEB. 16, 1968
2 Apr 09 Winnipeg- QB INFORMATION & RECORD Accused (Dean Michael Love)
3 Apr 09 Winnipeg-QB INFORMATION & RECORD
4 Apr 09 Winnipeg-QB NOTICE TO APPEAR
5 Apr 09 Winnipeg-QB EXHIBIT LIST
6 May 03 Winnipeg-QB INDICTMENT
7 May 09 Winnipeg-QB CONSENT TO TRIAL OCT. 30-31/
8 Jun 06 Winnipeg-QB TRANSCRIPT PROCEEDINGS-MARCH 19/
MITCHELL, J.
9 Oct 08 Winnipeg-QB WITNESS LIST SUBPOENAS DELIVERED
10 Oct 25 Winnipeg-QB ORDER-TO CONVEY A PRISONER WED. OCT. 30 @ 10AM
11 Feb 03 Winnipeg- QB CORRESPONDENCE FROM C BOND SENT MAR 27/ 9AM
12 Mar 19
Winnipeg-QB ORDER- TO CONVEY A PRISONER (Dean Michael Love) FRI. MARCH 27 @ 9AM
13 Mar 27 Winnipeg-QB DISPOSITION SHEET SCHWARTZ, J. – 90 DAYS INTER.
14 Mar 27 Winnipeg-QB PROBATION ORDER 2 YRS PROB. PLUS 100 HRS CSW
15 Mar 27 Winnipeg-QB REFERRAL TO PROBATION SERVICES RE; COMMUNITY SERVICE WORK
16 Jun 12 Winnipeg-QB CERTIFICATE OF NO APPEAL
17 Jun 12 Winnipeg-QB CORRESPONDENCE – (RETURN OF EXHIBITS) 30 DAY NOTICE TO COUNSEL
18 Aug 31 Winnipeg- QB CORRESPONDENCE – (RETURN OF Drug EXHIBITS) FROM C. BOND TO RCMP, 920616
19 Sep 15 Winnipeg- QB ORDER – EXHIBITS DISPOSITION
20 Feb 11 Winnipeg- QB TRANSCRIPT REASONS ON CONVICTION GIVEN NOV. 29/92 SCHWARTZ, J.
21 Feb 25 Winnipeg- QB CORRESPONDENCE FORM CROWN RE:FRAUD x 2
Parties (CR91-01-10196)
Party ID Party Name Lawyer
AC001 LOVE, DEAN MICHAEL (convict)
Full Title of Proceedings (CR91-01-10196)
BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN –AND- DEAN LOVE, ACCUSED.
Court Hearings (CR91-01-10196)
Contact Winnipeg Court of Queens Bench |
|
|
DEAN MICHAEL LOVE, FROM CATCH IT ON CAMERA IN WINNIPEG..YOU SHOULD NOT THROW STONES, , WE RESEARCHED YOUR CRIMNAL HISTORY OF FRAUD AND DRUG DEALING AND YOUR PRISON STAY...PEOPLE BE AFRAID OF THIS SHORT BALD FAT CAMERA SALESMAN WHO WANTS TO MANAGE YOUR ASSETS (KEEP INFORMED OF HOW THIS. CATCH IT ON CAMERA, OPERATES)
File Details
(CR91-01-10196 QUEEN vs LOVE, DEAN M.)
(CRIMINAL, DRUGS, FRAUD x2)
(204-945-0344)
DEAN Michael LOVE
Documents Filed (CR91-01-10196)
Doc
# Reg
Date Court
Location Document Notes
1 Apr 09 Winnipeg- QB INFORMATION & RECORD D.O.B. FEB. 16, 1968
2 Apr 09 Winnipeg- QB INFORMATION & RECORD Accused (Dean Michael Love)
3 Apr 09 Winnipeg-QB INFORMATION & RECORD
4 Apr 09 Winnipeg-QB NOTICE TO APPEAR
5 Apr 09 Winnipeg-QB EXHIBIT LIST
6 May 03 Winnipeg-QB INDICTMENT
7 May 09 Winnipeg-QB CONSENT TO TRIAL OCT. 30-31/
8 Jun 06 Winnipeg-QB TRANSCRIPT PROCEEDINGS-MARCH 19/
MITCHELL, J.
9 Oct 08 Winnipeg-QB WITNESS LIST SUBPOENAS DELIVERED
10 Oct 25 Winnipeg-QB ORDER-TO CONVEY A PRISONER(Dean Michael Love) WED. OCT. 30 @ 10AM
11 Feb 03 Winnipeg- QB CORRESPONDENCE FROM C BOND SENT MAR 27/ 9AM
12 Mar 19
Winnipeg-QB ORDER- TO CONVEY A PRISONER (Dean Michael Love) FRI. MARCH 27 @ 9AM
13 Mar 27 Winnipeg-QB DISPOSITION SHEET SCHWARTZ, J. – 90 DAYS INTER.
14 Mar 27 Winnipeg-QB PROBATION ORDER 2 YRS PROB. PLUS 100 HRS CSW
15 Mar 27 Winnipeg-QB REFERRAL TO PROBATION SERVICES RE; COMMUNITY SERVICE WORK
16 Jun 12 Winnipeg-QB CERTIFICATE OF NO APPEAL
17 Jun 12 Winnipeg-QB CORRESPONDENCE – (RETURN OF EXHIBITS) 30 DAY NOTICE TO COUNSEL
18 Aug 31 Winnipeg- QB CORRESPONDENCE – (RETURN OF Drug EXHIBITS) FROM C. BOND TO RCMP, 920616
19 Sep 15 Winnipeg- QB ORDER – EXHIBITS DISPOSITION
20 Feb 11 Winnipeg- QB TRANSCRIPT REASONS ON CONVICTION GIVEN NOV. 29/92 SCHWARTZ, J.
21 Feb 25 Winnipeg- QB CORRESPONDENCE FORM CROWN RE:FRAUD x 2
Parties (CR91-01-10196)
Party ID Party Name Lawyer
AC001 LOVE, DEAN MICHAEL (convict)
Full Title of Proceedings (CR91-01-10196)
BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN –AND- DEAN LOVE, ACCUSED.
Court Hearings (CR91-01-10196)
Contact Winnipeg Court of Queens Bench
Post |
|
|
Please Ray, those are 20 YEARS OLD! HOW DOES THAT AFFECT A BUSINESS OPERATING IN 2011? AND THERE ARE NO FRAUD CONVICTIONS EVER YOU HAVE ADDED THAT TO BOLSTER YOUR SLANDER.
ON THE OTHER HAND, YOU HAVE CERTAINLY A MUCH MORE ACTIVE CRIMINAL HISTORY.
LET US TAKE A DETAILED LOOK:
CONVICTED COCAINE DEALER AND MONEY LAUNDERER
CR06-01-26670
14-Mar-2006
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND JAMES
CR06-01-26850
23-Jun-2006
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR06-01-27433
03-Jan-2007
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR08-01-28712
26-Jun-2008
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR94-01-15624
30-Sep-1994
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND
CR97-01-18461
18-Mar-1997
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR97-01-18463
03-Apr-1997
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND
CR97-01-18566
02-May-1997
QUEEN VS RYABCHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR97-01-18751
03-Jul-1997
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR98-01-20063
14-Sep-1998
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR98-01-20065
14-Sep-1998
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR99-01-20388
18-Jan-1999
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND
CR99-01-20472
03-Feb-1999
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND
CR99-01-20727
07-May-1999
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.
CR99-01-20986
23-Aug-1999
QUEEN VS RYBACHUK, RAYMOND
(CR06-01-26670 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND JAMES)
Documents Filed (CR06-01-26670)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
14-Mar-2006
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION (JUDGE)
BAIL
2
14-Mar-2006
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF CHRIS IWANCHUK SWORN 14MAR2006
3
14-Mar-2006
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF BRENDA ALTOMARE SWORN 14MAR2006
4
14-Mar-2006
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK SWORN 14MARCH2006
5
14-Mar-2006
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PROV COURT 408 YORK SWAIL, PJ 31-JAN-2006
6
16-Mar-2006
Winnipeg-QB
BAIL HEARING ORDER
SCURFIELD, J. 16MAR2006, PREVIOUS BAIL VACATED AND NEW BAIL GRANTED
7
16-Mar-2006
Winnipeg-QB
RECOGNIZANCE
16MAR2006, OWN RECOGNIZANCE, 1 SURETY, PERSONAL APPEARANCES, RESIEDE, COURT PERMISSION TO MOVE, NO CONTACT, NOT ATTEND, CURFEW AND CHECKS, NO WEAPONS
(CR06-01-26850 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.)
Documents Filed (CR06-01-26850)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
23-Jun-2006
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPEAL-SUM CONV (TRANSCRIPT)
2
23-Jun-2006
Winnipeg-QB
ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE
NOTICE OF APPEAL, RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK, 23JUN2006,
3
23-Jun-2006
Winnipeg-QB
COURT TRANSCRIPT ORDER REQUEST
24MAY2006, 2 COMPLETE COPIES "I", REGULAR,
4
26-Jun-2006
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - TO
PROV CRT 408 YORK AVENUE, WPG
5
29-Jun-2006
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
PROV COURT 408 YORK -23-JUN-2006 ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS
6
29-Jun-2006
Winnipeg-QB
EXHIBIT LIST
7
21-Sep-2006
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PROV COURT 408 YORK 24-MAY-2006
8
21-Sep-2006
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
JUDGEMENT DELIVERED 24-MAY-2006 MOAR, J
9
12-Dec-2006
Winnipeg-QB
CONSENT TO HEARING DATE (SUM CONV)
16FEB2007 @ 10:00 A.M.
10
08-Feb-2007
Winnipeg-QB
FACTUM
OF ACCUSED/APPELLANT
11
14-Feb-2007
Winnipeg-QB
FACTUM
OF RESP
12
19-Feb-2007
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
SUCHE J, 16FEB2007, APPEAL DISMISSED
13
02-Mar-2007
Winnipeg-QB
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
SUCHE J, 22FEB2007 FROM DECISION OF 16FEB2007
14
02-Mar-2007
Winnipeg-QB
CERTIFICATE OF DECISION (APPEAL)
SUCHE J, CERTIFICATE DATED 28FEB2007 FROM 16FEB2007
(CR06-01-27433 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.)
Documents Filed (CR06-01-27433)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
03-Jan-2007
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPEAL-SUM CONV (NO TRANSCRIPT)
25OCT2005/RED LIGHT
2
03-Jan-2007
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - TO
PROV. CRT. 373 BROADWAY REQUESTING ORIGINAL INFORMATION.
3
03-Jan-2007
Winnipeg-QB
COURT TRANSCRIPT ORDER REQUEST
4
17-Jan-2007
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
PROV COURT 373 BROADWAY ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS
5
20-Apr-2007
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PROV COURT 373 BROADWAY 19-DEC-2006- SUNDSTROM, JJP
6
18-Sep-2007
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
SPIVAK, J. - 07SEPT2007 - APPEAL DISMISSED - ORIGINAL DISPOSITION TO STAND
7
18-Sep-2007
Winnipeg-QB
CERTIFICATE OF DECISION (APPEAL)
SPIVAK, J. - 07SEPT2007 - APPEAL DISMISSED - ORIGINAL DISPOSITION TO STAND
(CR08-01-28712 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.)
Documents Filed (CR08-01-28712)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
26-Jun-2008
Winnipeg-QB
INFORMATION & RECORD
2
26-Jun-2008
Winnipeg-QB
PROVINCIAL COURT DISPOSITION DOCUMENTS
BAN-YES, ELECTION JUDGE & JURY,
3
26-Jun-2008
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE TO APPEAR
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK, 09JUL2008 ROOM #210 AT 9:30 AM
4
26-Jun-2008
Winnipeg-QB
EXHIBIT LIST
C-16
5
24-Jul-2008
Winnipeg-QB
INDICTMENT
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK 17JUL2008
6
11-Aug-2008
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PRELIM VOL 1 - 2008JUN23 - POLLACK, P.J.
7
11-Aug-2008
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PRELIM VOL 2 - 2008JUN24
8
11-Aug-2008
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PRELIM VOL 3 - 2008JUN25
9
11-Aug-2008
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PRELIM VOL 4 - 2008JUN26
10
10-Sep-2008
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET - SENTENCING
BRYK, J - 08SEP2008 - STAY OF PROCEEDINGS COUNTS 1 & 2
1
30-Sep-1994
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPEAL
2
06-Oct-1994
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
OLIPHANT, ACJ - CONSENT ORDER TO EXT TIME
3
20-Oct-1994
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPEAL TO OCT 20/94
4
20-Oct-1994
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPEAL-SUM. CONVICTION (REPORTER)
5
20-Oct-1994
Winnipeg-QB
REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT
6
25-Oct-1994
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE TO
P.J.C. - 373 BROADWAY
7
27-Oct-1994
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PROCEEDINGS JUNE 29/94
8
21-Nov-1994
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE FROM
PROV CRT 373 BROADWAY ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
9
14-Mar-1995
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MORSE, J.
10
14-Mar-1995
Winnipeg-QB
CERTIFICATE OF DECISION (APPEAL)
ACCUSED'S APPEAL ABANDONED; ORIG.CONV.&SENT.STAND(CR97-01-18461 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.)
Documents Filed (CR97-01-18461)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
18-Mar-1997
Winnipeg-QB
UNDERTAKING
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA INRESPECT OF A RESTRAINT ORDER APPLICATION
2
18-Mar-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
3
18-Mar-1997
Winnipeg-QB
APPLICATION
FOR A RESTRAINT ORDER
4
18-Mar-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
RESTRAINT
5
09-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
APPLICATION
FOR RESTRAINT ORDER
6
09-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF MARK STEVEN FOX SWORN 970325
7
09-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
UNDERTAKING
8
09-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
KRINDLE, J. RESTRAINT MARCH 25, 1997
9
10-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE FROM
E. MAGAS DATED APRIL 3, 1997
10
16-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
R.J.RYBACHUK SW. 97/07/16
11
17-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
RESTRAINT
12
17-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
UNDERTAKING
13
17-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
RESTRAING PROPERTIES
14
17-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
M.S. FOX 97/07/14
15
21-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
MOTIONS BRIEF
OF APPLICANT
16
28-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MACINNES, J. ADJ.SINE DIE.
17
02-Sep-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MACINNES, J. ORDER HANDWRITTEN NOTESPRIVILEGED
18
02-Sep-1997
Winnipeg-QB
MOTIONS BRIEF
OF RESPONDENT
19
22-Sep-1997
Winnipeg-QB
APPLICATION
20
22-Sep-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
KRINDLE, J. - SEPTEMBER 17/97
21
19-Dec-1997
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
RESTRAINT OF PROPERTY
22
19-Dec-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF MARK FOX -97/12/16
23
08-Jan-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
BARKMAN, J. - ORDER FOR EXTENSION GRANTED
24
08-Jan-1998
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
BARKMAN, J. - ORDER EXTENDING RESTRAINT OF PROPERTY
25
18-Jun-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
ORDER, RELEASING FUNDS HELD UNDER AN ORDER SECTION 482.34
26
18-Jun-1999
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND RYBACHUK 11 MAY 1999
27
24-Jun-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MORSE J, 24JUN1999 ADJ TO 15JUL1999
28
15-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MONNIN, J-MOTION ADJ. TO JULY 22/99 @ 9:30-UNCONTESTED LIST
29
20-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
JULY 22/99
30
22-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
BRYK J 22JUL99 ADJ TO 29JUL99 @ 9:30
31
29-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
BRYK, J-29JULY99-ADJ. 11AUG99 AT9:30AM
32
12-Aug-1999
Court of Appeal
DISPOSITION SHEET
KAUFMAN, J/MOTION FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS ADJ. SINE DIE
33
18-Jun-2002
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
$525.94 RECEIVER GENERAL OF CANADA 19 JUNE 2002 FINAL PAYMNET(CR97-01-18463 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND)
Documents Filed (CR97-01-18463)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
03-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
2
10-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE FROM
E. MAGAS
3
17-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
ADJ TO APR 24/97 9:30 AM
4
22-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF D.DONEN - 97/04/21
5
24-Apr-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MACINNES, J. ADJ.MAY 1/97 9:30 A.M.
6
01-May-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
STEEL, J. ADJ. TOMAY 14/97 2:00 P.M.
7
07-May-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF M.S.FOX - 97/05/01
8
14-May-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
BEARD, J-MOT.ADJ.JUNE4/[email protected] ALLOW.TO W/DRW.GINDIN-CSL.OF RECORD
9
19-Jun-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
DUVAL, J-ADJ.TO JULY28/97@10/ORDER RE:FILING OF MATERIAL&ACC.MUST BE PRESENT
10
14-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE TO
J. GINDIN FROM DUVAL, J. JULY 10/97
11
06-Aug-1997
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
CUSTODIAN OF DOCUMENTS
12
06-Aug-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
J. MACDOUGALL 97/07/30
13
06-Aug-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
APPL. & AFFD'T. ON J. GINDIN
14
14-Aug-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
STEEL, J. AUG.14/97
15
14-Aug-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
STEEL, J. AUG.14/97
16
11-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
R.J.RYBACHUK, 11SEPT98
(CR97-01-18566 QUEEN vs RYABCHUK, RAYMOND J.)
Documents Filed (CR97-01-18566)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
02-May-1997
Winnipeg-QB
APPLICATION
FOR AN ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE OF TAXINFORMATION
2
02-May-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
3
02-May-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
4
22-Sep-1997
Winnipeg-QB
APPLICATION
5
22-Sep-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
KRINDLE, J. SEPT 17/97
6
22-Sep-1997
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE FROM
M. MASON
7
26-Jan-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
8
26-Jan-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
R. RYBACHUK SWORN 26JAN98
9
29-Jan-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MYKLE, J. MATTER STRUCK, NO ONE APPEARING
10
06-Feb-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
SMITH, J. ADJ. MAY 4/98 10 A.M. ALL DAY HEARING SET
11
10-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
EXHIBIT LIST
RETURNED TO COUNSEL JUNE-3-02
12
10-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
ADJ TO JULY 9/98 @ 10AM JEWERS, J
13
26-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
DISCLOSURE
14
13-Jul-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF RESERVED JUDGMENT
JULY 9. 1998, JEWERS, J.
15
16-Jul-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
ADJ TO JULY 23/98 @ 9:30 DUVAL J
16
20-Jul-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK-17JUL1998
17
23-Jul-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
APPL DISMISSED JEWERS J
18
12-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
MARK G. MASON DATED 23JUL98 TO COURT OF QB
19
12-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
JEWERS, J - 11AUG98 - MOTION DISMISSED
20
14-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
21
19-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND J. RYBACHUK, 19AUG1998
22
21-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI, J-ADJ. TO AUG. 24/98 AT 1:00 P.M.
23
21-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI, J-ADJ. TO AUG. 24/98 AT 1:00 P.M.
24
02-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
JEWERS J AUG 26/98
25
02-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
SEE REASONS JEWERS J AUG 26/98
26
04-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI J, 4SEP1998 MOTION BEFORE JEWERS J ADJ TO 16SEP1998 @ 9AM & PRETRIAL /MOTIONS BEFORE GLOWACKI J ADJ TO 29SEP1998 @ 1PM
27
16-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
R. RYBACHUK 15SEP98
28
16-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
JEWERS J 16 SEP 1998 MOTION $250/HR SENIOR COUNSEL COURT/150/HR OTHER TIME; 2/3 OF THOSE AMTS FOR JR COUNSEL; PROPERTY TO GO FOR SALE & PROCEEDS INTEREST BEARING ACCT
29
24-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
REVOKE RESTRAINING ORDER-17MAR1997.
30
24-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RICHARD STEFANYSHYN-16NOV1998.
31
24-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
32
26-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
WRIGHT, J. ADJ. TO DECEMBER 3/98 9:30 A.M.
33
03-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
GLOWACKI, J. - RESTRAINT ORDER GRANTED
34
03-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI J - CONSENT ORDER SIGNED IN CRT.
35
12-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
RICHARD STEFANYSHYN-SCURFIELD TAPPER CUDDY
36
15-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
PAYMENT TO KILLEEN & CO PER MEMO OF JEWERS, J.(SEALED) IN LOCKUP)
37
28-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
B. LEE BAIG 28-JAN-1999( SEALED) IN LOCKUP)
38
28-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
KILLEEN CHAPMAN GARRECK 29-JAN-1999(SEALED) IN LOCKUP
39
11-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
SEALED DOCUMENT
CONFIDENTIAL(FILED IN ;LOCKUP
40
23-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
B. LEE BAIG 19-FEB-1999(SEALED) IN LOCKUP
41
23-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
KILLEEN CHAPMAN 19-FEB-1999(SEALED) IN LOCKUP)
42
04-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
KILLEEN CHAPMAN (SEALED) LOCKUP
43
25-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
B. LEE BAIG (SEALED)
44
31-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
SCURFIELD TAPPER CUDDY RE: DEPOSIT
45
30-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
MEMORANDUM
JUSTICE WRIGHT
46
30-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
B.A. EVANS 8, 122.13 MAY 3, 1999
47
30-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
10, 634.89 KILLEEN CHAPMAN 03 MAY 1999
48
30-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
B. LEE BAIG 48, 835.05 MAY 3, 1999
49
05-May-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
B. & E. EVANS AND ASSOC. 13, 656.20 06 MAY 1999
50
27-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
B.EE BAIG 9, 683..50 30 AUG 1999
51
28-Feb-2000
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - DIARY
52
15-Mar-2000
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION (JUDGE)
RELEASE OF FUNDS
53
21-Mar-2000
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND J. RYBACHUK, 16MAR2000
54
23-Aug-2000
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
870.00 MINISTER F FINANCE DEPT OF JUSTICE WOODSWORTH ORDER N FILE CI990112757
55
14-Dec-2001
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
$10, 981.81 TIM KILLEEN 17 DEC 2001 ORDER IN FILE CR 990120727
56
29-Apr-2002
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - FOR CHEQUE
$3, 969.99 RECEIVER GENERAL 1 MAY 2002 PLUS INTEREST OF 11.59 AND 634.23
(CR97-01-18751 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.)
Documents Filed (CR97-01-18751)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
03-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
INDICTMENT
2
08-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
APPLICATION
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK
3
08-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF CONSTABLE WAYNE WHITE SWORN JUNE 30/97 -
4
08-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
WARRANT FOR ARREST
5
08-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
WARRANT OF COMMITTAL
6
08-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER-TO CONVEY A PRISONER
7
08-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION (DIARY)
DIRECT INDICTMENT
8
09-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PROCEEDINGS MAY 16, 1997
9
09-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
BAIL
10
09-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK-97/07/10
11
14-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK SW JULY 10/97
12
14-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
RECOGNIZANCE
OR $10, 000- PLUS 2 SURITIES $10, 000-
13
14-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER - FOR DISCHARGE (IN CUSTODY)
14
14-Jul-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER - BAIL
JEWERS, J. - BAIL APPLICATION GRANTED
15
12-Aug-1997
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER-TO CONVEY A PRISONER
WED AUG 13/97 @ 9:30 AM
16
07-Nov-1997
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
COMPEL WITNESS TO ATTEND
17
07-Nov-1997
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF R.J.RYBACHUK - 97/11/13
18
13-Nov-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MORSE, J. ADJ. NOV.20/97 9:30 A.M.
19
20-Nov-1997
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
OLIPHANT, ACJ ADJ TO FEB 17/98
20
18-Mar-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
K Molle TD Nov 30-Dec 18/98
21
19-Mar-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI, J-ADJ. TO MAY 7/98 @ 2:00 P.M.
22
04-May-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
C Bond Assize Nov 30-Dec 18/98 & Jury Selection Oct 29/98
23
06-May-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
K Molle PT adj to Oct 1/98
24
03-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
ACCUSED HAS DECIDED TO CHANGE COUNSEL
25
11-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
HIRSCHFIELD, J. GRANTS ADJ TO JUNE 18, 1998 9:30 A.M.
26
15-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI J ADJ TO JUNE 22 @9:00 AM
27
22-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
MISC. CORRESPONDENCE FROM CROWN TO COUNSEL
28
22-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI, J. COUNSEL GRANTED LEAVE TO WITHDRAW, PRETRIAL SET FOR AUG 24/98 AT 1:00
29
22-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - DIARY
RE-SCHEDULE DOC. #16
30
24-Jun-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
K. MOLLE RE; MOT DATE AUGUST 28/98 10 AM GLOWACKI, J.
31
02-Jul-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
NURGITZ J. 2JULY1998, MOTION ADJ TO AUG 28/98. SUGGEST TO CROWN THAT ANY ORDER GRANTED AUG 28/98, CROWN TO PROVIDE EXPEDICIOUSLY
32
04-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DECLARATION OF SERVICE
10 SUBPOENAS
33
18-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
APPLICANT
34
18-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF FRANK GRAAF SW 18 AUG 1998
35
18-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
36
19-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
notice of motion aff 19 aug 1998d
37
20-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AUTHORITIES - CASE LAW (B-FILE)
APPLICANT
38
21-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
39
27-Aug-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
JEWERS, J. ADJ.SEPT. 4/98 9 A.M. BEFORE GLOWACKI, J.
40
21-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
APPLICATION TO REVOKE BAIL (FEDERAL)
41
24-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
HEWAK, CJ ADJ 28SEP98 @2PM BAIL
42
25-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF SGT. REID BINGHAM SWORN 25SEP98
43
29-Sep-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI, J - CROWN WITHDRAWS APPLICATION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
44
07-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
EXHIBIT
#1 - CORRESPONDENCE FROM PETER BIRSE TO REID BINGHAM
45
07-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
BAIL HEARING ORDER
MACINNES J, 02OCT1998, BAIL REVOCATION DENIED
46
19-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NON-DIARY MOTION/APPLICATION
EXCLUDE PUBLIC/TRIAL set down for October 30, 1998 at 10 am- Glowacki, J.
47
20-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
CPL. THOMAS SUTCLIFFE 19 OCT 1998
48
21-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
Set for Oct 30, 1998 10 am w/Glowacki, j.
49
21-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
WITNESS LIST
27 SUBPEONAS
50
22-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION-BAIL
crown application to revoke bail-to be adjourned to October 23, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. before MacInnes, J.
51
22-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
R. RYBACHUK SWORN 21OCT98
52
22-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
SMITH, J. MAATTER SET FOR HEARING FOR OCTOBER 30/98 10 A.M. BEFORE GLOWACKI, J.
53
26-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
BAIL HEARING ORDER
OCT 23/98 - MACINNES, J - BAIL REVOKED
54
26-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
WARRANT OF COMMITTAL
BY MACINNES, J
55
29-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
BAIL HEARING ORDER
MACINNES J OCT 28/98 BAIL DENIED
56
30-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
57
30-Oct-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI J, 30OCT1998 ORDER BANNING ANY PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION IN COURT ON THESE MOTIONS & ORDER EXCLUDING PUBLIC FROM ATTENDING THE HEARING WHEN INFORMANT TESTIFIES NOT INCLUD. MEDIA; IMMED.FAMILY OF ACCUSED; SECURITY OFFICERS; SHERIFFS & COUNSEL.
58
17-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
ADJ OF TRIAL
59
18-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
60
18-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
K. Molle, TD ADJ NEW DATES TO BE SET
61
19-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
Hirschfield, j. trial dates for dec-1-98 cancelled new dates Jury selection Feb-25-99 trial dates march 22-99 to april9-99 incl.
62
20-Nov-1998
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
K.MOLLE, TD MAR 22 - APR 9/99
63
14-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION-BAIL
64
14-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
65
15-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
OCTOBER 22, 1998- JUSTICE GLOWACKI
66
15-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
OCTOBER 23, 1998 - JUSTICE MACINNES
67
15-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
OCTOBER 28, 1998 - JUSTICE MACINNES
68
15-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND RYBACHUK, 15DEC1998
69
22-Dec-1998
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
HAMILTON J, 22DEC1998, ADJ TO 04JAN1999 AT 2:00 PM BY CONSENT
70
13-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
ORDER
71
18-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
72
21-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI, J.ADJ. TO JANURY 28/99 9:30 A.M.
73
26-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PROCEEDINGS OCT 20/98
74
26-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND RYBACHUK 26 JAN 1999
75
28-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
KAUFMAN, J. ADJ. TO FEBRUARY 4/99 9:30 A.M.
76
05-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NON-DIARY MOTION/APPLICATION
FEB 16 & 17 AT 2 PM
77
15-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF CST. CHRISTOPHER TURNER-15FEB1999
78
01-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
HANNSEN J. 18FEB99
79
15-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
80
19-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NON-DIARY MOTION/APPLICATION
EXCLUDING PUBLIC FROM TRIAL
81
19-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF CST. J.D. MICHAEL BOYER-19MAR1999
82
16-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF CROWN ON LAW OF DISCLOSURE
83
16-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
HANSSEN J/TURNOVER OF DRUG EXHS. TO RCMP
84
16-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
HANSSEN J/EXCLUSION OF PUBLIC DURING TESTIMONY OF POLICE AGENT
85
16-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
EXHIBIT LIST
MAY-22-02 RETURNED TO RCMP VICE
86
27-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
HANSSEN, J. - SENTENCED 44 MTHS CONC. + $8, 000 FINE - 6 MTHS DEFAULT TIME, CONSECUTIVE
87
27-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
FINE ORDER
$8, 000 - PAYABLE BY 31/7/2003 - NOT SIGNED BY ACCUSED
88
30-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
HANSSEN J, 26JULY1999, REASONS FOR SENTENCE
89
31-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPEAL
AR 99-30-04283
(CR99-01-20388 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND)
Documents Filed (CR99-01-20388)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
18-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
INFORMATION & RECORD
DISPO, BHO, TRIAL NOTICE,
2
18-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE TO APPEAR
10FEB1999 RM210 AT 9:30 A.M.
3
21-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
EXHIBIT LIST
BOX 1 IN STORAGE 98/2048122 UTTER THREATS
4
21-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
WARRANT OF COMMITTAL
5
26-Jan-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
OF BAIL PROCEEDINGS DEC 16, 1998
6
09-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
10FEB99 @ 9:30 AM
7
10-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
INDICTMENT
8
10-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
CONSENT TO TRIAL
JUDGE & JURY APR19-21/99
9
01-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
GUY J. 14JAN99 PROCEEDINGS VOL1
10
01-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
GUY J. 18 JAN99 PROCEEDINGS VOL2
11
10-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
WITNESS LIST
3 SUBPEONAS TO SHERIFF
12
24-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION
ADJOURNMENT OF TRIAL
13
26-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
SCHWART J 25MAR99 ADJ TO APR 19/99 @ 9AM; JURY PANEL TO RETURN AT THAT TIME
14
16-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
19APR99 @ 10 AM
15
21-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
KAUFMAN, J-ACQUITTED ON TWO COUNTS
16
21-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER FOR DISCHARGE- PRISONER (CUSTODY)
GIVEN TO SHERIFFS APR. 21/99 @ 12:45 P.M.
17
26-May-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
REASONS FOR DECISION, KAUFMAN, J.;APRIL 21/99
18
18-Jun-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPEAL
AR99-30-04191
90
27-Sep-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT
OF APPEAL AGAINST ACQUITTAL AR99-30-04191
91
05-Oct-2001
Winnipeg-QB
CERTIFICATE OF DECISION (COURT OF APPEAL)
APPEALS IN BOTH CONVICTION AND SENTENCE ARE DISMISSED
92
12-Apr-2002
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - RETURN OF EXHIBITS
30 DAYS NOTICE TO COUNSEL
CR99-01-20472 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND)
Documents Filed (CR99-01-20472)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
03-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF APPEAL-SUM CONV (TRANSCRIPT)
2
03-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DECLARATION OF SERVICE
3
03-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - TO
PC-408 YORK AVENUE
4
08-Feb-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE
NOTICE OF APPEAL
5
09-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PROCEEDINGS JANUARY 4/99
6
09-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
PROCEEDINGS DEC. 30/98
7
29-Mar-1999
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - TO
COUNSEL RE; AC APRIL 14/99
8
13-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
14APR99 @ 9:30 AM
9
16-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - DIARY
SUMMARY CONVICTI0N APPEAL
10
27-Apr-1999
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
C. BOND CONFIRM APPEAL MAY 11/99 AT 2 PM
11
07-May-1999
Winnipeg-QB
FACTUM
OF THE RESP
12
11-May-1999
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
BEARD, J. APPEAL ABANDONED BY APPLICANT RYBACHUK
13
13-May-1999
Winnipeg-QB
CERTIFICATE OF DECISION (APPEAL)
BEARD, J. APPEAL ABANDONED, DISPOSITION: MOTION DISMISSED.
(CR99-01-20727 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND J.)
Documents Filed (CR99-01-20727)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
05-May-1999
Winnipeg-QB
INFORMATION & RECORD
PROV CRT FILE # 99-00952
2
05-May-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE TO APPEAR
14-JUL-1999 ROOM # 210 AT 9;30 AM
3
05-May-1999
Winnipeg-QB
EXHIBIT LIST
RETURNED TO RCMP PROCEEDS OF CRIME MAY-22-02
4
12-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
INDICTMENT
5
12-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
JULY14/99 AT 9:30AM
6
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 22APR1999, VOL 1
7
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 23APR1999, VOL 2
8
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 26APR1999, VOL 3
9
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 27APR1999, VOL 4
10
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 28APR1999, VOL 5
11
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 29APR1999, VOL 6
12
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 03MAY1999, VOL 7
13
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 04MAY1999, VOL 8
14
13-Jul-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
SWAIL J, 05MAY1999, VOL 9
15
11-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
WED AUG 11/99 @ 9:30 AM
16
12-Oct-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
13OCT99 @ 9:30 AM
17
11-Jan-2000
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
12JAN00 @ 9:30 AM
18
24-Jan-2000
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
1FEB00 @ 9 AM
19
15-Feb-2000
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
22FEB00 @ 9 AM
20
22-Feb-2000
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MACINNES, J - ADJ. FEB.2900 - 10 AM (COURT TO RELEASE INFO. RE: FUNDS REMAINING IN COURT TO PAY LEGAL FEES FROM PREV. TRIAL. KRAHN TO SUPPLY ACCUSED WITH LIST OF PROPERTY AND VALUATIONS STILL HELD)
21
01-Mar-2000
Winnipeg-QB
REQUISITION - DIARY
ONE HOUR MOTION WITH MACINNES, J.
22
24-Mar-2000
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MACINNES, J. GRANTS ORDER RELEASING FUNDS & ADJ MATTER TO 11APR00 AT 9AM
23
11-Apr-2000
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MACINNES, J. ADJ TO 18APRIL2000 AT 9:00
24
18-Apr-2000
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
P/5 01FEB00, MACINNES J
25
18-Apr-2000
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MACINNES J, 18APR00, TRIAL DATES ADJ TO ASSIGNMENT COURT 14JUNE00, P/T SET FOR 05JUN00 AT 9:00 A.M.
26
20-Apr-2000
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - TO
TO COUNSEL FROM JUSTICE MACINNES
27
12-Jul-2000
Winnipeg-QB
WARRANT FOR ARREST
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK
28
21-Aug-2000
Winnipeg-QB
MEMORANDUM
WARRANT QUASHED BY ORDER DATED AUG. 9/00 A.C.J.Q.B. OLIPHANT
29
06-Sep-2000
Winnipeg-QB
CONSENT TO TRIAL
TD APR30-JUNE22, 2001
30
06-Sep-2000
Winnipeg-QB
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRIAL DATE
R RYBACHUK
31
06-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION (JUDGE)
ORDER THAT GLOWACKI, J BE DISQUALIFIED FROM HEARING TRIAL
32
06-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND RYBACHUK 05MAR2001
33
08-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
KEYSER, J. - MARCH 8/01 ADJOURNED TO PRE TRIAL MARCH 9/01 9 AM WITH GLOWACKI, J. TO SET DATE FOR HEARING OF MOTION
34
13-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF ACCUSED
35
15-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
K.MOLLE (CROWN COUNSEL) 14 MAR 2001
36
15-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
CROWN BRIEF ON APPREHENSION OF JUDICIAL BIAS
37
22-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
JUSTICE MACINNES-15 AUG 2000
38
22-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
JUSTICE MACINNES 27 JUN 2000
39
26-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NON-DIARY MOTION/APPLICATION
SET FOR 6 APR 2001 AT 9:00 A. M.
40
26-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK 21 MAR 2001
41
29-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF APPLICANT
42
30-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION (JUDGE)
OF ACCUSED FOR ORDER PRODUCTION OF OF INVOICES
43
30-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
OF RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK SWORN 28MAR2001
44
30-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF ACCUSED
45
30-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION (JUDGE)
OF ACCUSED FOR ORDER CROWN ESTOPPED RELITIGATING ISSUE
46
30-Mar-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF ACCUSED
47
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
PERLOV STEWART 03APR2001
48
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
HANSSEN, J. 23MAR1999 VOLUME 1
49
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 2
50
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 3
51
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 4
52
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 5
53
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 6
54
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 7
55
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 8
56
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 9
57
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 10
58
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 11
59
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 12
60
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 13
61
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 14
62
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 15
63
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
VOLUME 16
64
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
HANSSEN, J. 23JUN1999
65
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
HANSSEN, J. 26JUL1999
66
03-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
REASONS FOR SENTENCE HANSSEN, J. 26JUL1999
67
04-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION (JUDGE)
ORDER, SHORT LEAVE, COSTS
68
04-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK 3 APR 2001
69
09-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
GLOWACKI, J. 06APR2001 MOTION TO HAVE GLOWACKI, J. RECUSED IS DENIED/REVEALING OF THE NAME OF ALIAS ADJ/DSL & COSTCO ASPECTS ARE ADJ SINE-DIE/TRIAL TO BE ADJ/DATES FOR HEARING OF FURTHER MOTIONS & VOIDIRE TO BE SET BY CSL WITH C. FLEMING
70
25-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF CROWN RE: CO- CONSPIRATORS' EXCEPTION TO HEARSAY RULE
71
25-Apr-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF CROWN RE INSTRUCTION TO JURY RE CREDIBILITY
72
02-May-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF RESPONDENT RE: INDICTMENT
73
31-May-2001
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
NOT OF MOT, AFF, MOT BRIEF, ADVANCE PAPER BOX LTD, 2 APR 2001
74
01-Jun-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
ACCUSED
75
01-Jun-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
SUPPLEMENTARY OF ACCUSED
76
07-Jun-2001
Winnipeg-QB
DIARY SET DOWN (INTERNAL USE ONLY)
2 DAY MOTION 10 AM & 2 PM MONNIN, J. SEIZED
77
13-Jun-2001
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MONNIN J, 12JUN2001 MOTION ON ADMISSIBILITY IS ADJ SINE DIE & PRE-TRIAL SET: 3AUG2001 @ 10 AM FOR 1/2 DAY.
78
13-Jun-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF RESERVED JUDGMENT
12JUN2001 MONNIN J.
79
29-Aug-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF MOTION (JUDGE)
APPL FOR CROWN TO PROVIDE DISCLOSURE, COSTS
80
29-Aug-2001
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND RYBACHUK, 28AUG2001
81
29-Aug-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
APPLICANT/ACCUSED
82
18-Sep-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NON-DIARY MOTION/APPLICATION
ORDER, THIRD PARTY, FIN STATEMENTS, SHORT LEAVE, COSTS
83
18-Sep-2001
Winnipeg-QB
AFFIDAVIT
RAYMOND JAMES RYBACHUK 17 SEP 2001
84
18-Sep-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
APPLICANT
85
21-Sep-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF RESP.
86
03-Oct-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF RESERVED JUDGMENT
02OCT2001 MONNIN, J.
87
16-Oct-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF DEFENCE
88
26-Oct-2001
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MONNIN J - WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH NON-DICSCL OF NAME, ON FURTHER INFO. APPLIC CAN BE MADE; OTHER-- PRIOR TO EVID
89
26-Nov-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NON-DIARY MOTION/APPLICATION
OF APPLICANT-RECEPTION OF EVIDENCE-11DEC2001
90
26-Nov-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
OF APPLICANT
91
26-Nov-2001
Winnipeg-QB
AUTHORITIES - CASE LAW (B-FILE)
92
27-Nov-2001
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE OF REJECTION
OF ORDER - (NOT SET UP PROPERLY) MACINNES, J. REJECTED ORDER AS FILED
93
29-Nov-2001
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER
MACINNES, J. - 24-MAR-00 - ORDER FOR FUNDS HELD UNDER SEIZURE BE RELEAASED TO TIMOTHY KILLEEN FOR PAYMENT
94
30-Nov-2001
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - FROM
ANNE KRAHN ASSIZE 07JAN2002 TO 28MAR2002
95
10-Dec-2001
Winnipeg-QB
MOTION BRIEF
APPLICANT
96
19-Dec-2001
Winnipeg-QB
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
MONNIN, J. 28AUGUST01 THE MOTION IS DISMISSED
97
04-Jan-2002
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
MONNIN, J/1 YR & 3 MOS. CONC. ON CTS. 1 & 2 AND CONC. ON SENTENCE PRESENTLY BEING SERVED + FINE (IN LIEU OF FORF.) $100, 000.00 PAYABLE FORTHWITH, I/D 1 YR, 9 MOS. CONSEC. TO TERM OF IMPRISONMENT + ORDER OF FORF. OF ALL ITEMS HELD BY RCMP; SC WAIVED
98
04-Jan-2002
Winnipeg-QB
FINE ORDER
$100, 000.00 PAYABLE FORTHWITH; IN DEFAULT 1 YR, 9 MOS. CONSEC. TO TERM OF IMPRISONMENT
(CR99-01-20986 QUEEN vs RYBACHUK, RAYMOND)
Documents Filed (CR99-01-20986)
Doc #
Reg Date
Court Location
Document
Notes
1
24-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
INFORMATION & RECORD
PROV CRT FILE # 99-03825
2
24-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
RECOGNIZANCE
SURETY: SLAW RIBACHUK $10, 000.00 & SURETY: ANTONIO DISANTO $10, 000.00, ACCUSED DEPOSITS IN CASH HEREWITH $10, 000.00 ATTEND PROV CRT ON 24 APR 1998 AT 10:00 AM, PERSONAL APPEARANCES IN COURT ON ALL REMAND DATES, RESIDE AT 25 CAMROSE BAY WPG AND NOTIFY EC.
3
24-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
A SURETY'S ROLE IN BAIL MATTERS
SLAW RIBACHUK
4
24-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
A SURETY'S ROLE IN BAIL MATTERS
ANTONIO DISANTO
5
24-Aug-1999
Winnipeg-QB
NOTICE TO APPEAR
13OCT1999 ROOM#210 AT 9:30 AM
6
13-Sep-1999
Winnipeg-QB
TRANSCRIPT
KOPSTEIN J, 23AUG1999, PRELIM INQUIRY
7
08-Oct-1999
Winnipeg-QB
INDICTMENT
8
12-Oct-1999
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
13OCT99 @ 9:30AM
9
22-Feb-2000
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER TO CONVEY A PRISONER
WED MAR 1/00 @ 10 AM
10
01-Mar-2000
Winnipeg-QB
DISPOSITION SHEET
KEYSER, J STAY OR PROCEEDINGS ENTERED
11
01-Mar-2000
Winnipeg-QB
ORDER FOR DISCHARGE- PRISONER (CUSTODY)
99
15-May-2002
Winnipeg-QB
CERTIFICATE OF NO APPEAL
100
15-May-2002
Winnipeg-QB
CORRESPONDENCE - RETURN OF EXHIBITS
30 DAYS NOTICE TO COUNSEL |
|
|
wonder if this guy will ever give his son a call... after 6 years |
|
|
Post your Comment
|
|
|